[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new global USE flag srcdist

2014-01-04 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:53:17 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Ryan Hill wrote: In case it's helpful here's what FOSSology[1] has to say about some common packages that people have uploaded to their demo server. I don't get your point here. The licenses of

[gentoo-dev] libtool lt_dlopenext vs. gen_ld_script: breakages at runtime

2014-01-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Summary: gen_ld_script is removing a vital unversioned symlink from some packages, and this breaks libtool lt_dlopenext consumers at runtime. Details: While examining bug #486640, I discovered a concerning interaction [1] between libtool's lt_dlopenext and gen_ld_script. I

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New portage version with latest fixes in git is needed

2014-01-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed) to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them important like: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490362 Not sure if I can

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New portage version with latest fixes in git is needed

2014-01-04 Thread Sebastian Luther
Am 04.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Saturday 04 January 2014 09:56:28 Brian Dolbec wrote: On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed) to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New portage version with latest fixes in git is needed

2014-01-04 Thread Sebastian Luther
Am 04.01.2014 15:56, schrieb Brian Dolbec: On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed) to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them important like: