-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function in
net-misc/netctl. Gentoo contributor Andrew Hamilton and I came up with
a cleaned up and expanded version of it, and I
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41
Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function in
net-misc/netctl. Gentoo contributor Andrew Hamilton and I came up with
a cleaned up and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41 Chris Reffett
creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
After some discussion on good ways to communicate optional
dependencies to users, I was shown the optfeature() function
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:36:06
Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2014 11:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:24:41 Chris Reffett
creff...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
After some discussion on good
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Christopher Head wrote:
If stable really is falling behind and the backlog is always growing,
obviously something has to be done. I just don't want something to
mean don't have a stable tree. The stable tree provides me with a
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:12:42 +
Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Christopher Head wrote:
If stable really is falling behind and the backlog is always
growing, obviously something has to be done. I just
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
I don't think that's what was being proposed, though. The question was
really the old complaint about slow architectures; the -* arch
solution sounds like the most reasonable definition of dropping
keywords, in the absence of AT
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:55:34 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
The complaint is slow to stable arches
Yes.
by specifying -* arch it would signify that ONLY that arch uses
that version of the ebuild - and it would be up to
Tom Wijsman wrote:
you shoot down solutions
Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
//Peter
pgpWdBSgiDfHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
you shoot down solutions
Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the feedback that makes it better.
Work towards a very good solution
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 00:50 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:42:28 +0100
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
you shoot down solutions
Maybe it wasn't a very good solution that deserved to be shot down.
Maybe it was; what is needed here, is the
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your suggestion was expanding the arm keyword to armv4-linux,
armv5-linux, armv6-linux, armv6-hardfloat-linux,
armv7-softfp-linux, armv7-hardfloat-linux,
armv7-hardfloat-uclibc-linux - that is nowhere near a good
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 04:04 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:04:19 -0600
Steev Klimaszewski st...@gentoo.org wrote:
Your suggestion was expanding the arm keyword to armv4-linux,
armv5-linux, armv6-linux, armv6-hardfloat-linux,
armv7-softfp-linux, armv7-hardfloat-linux,
13 matches
Mail list logo
