On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:06 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
No sir, I was not telling a half-truth.
If the default configuration is stored in /lib/udev/rules.d for example,
and you can override that default by dropping files of the same name in
/etc/udev/rules.d, I don't see
On 02/03/14 19:51, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Sure at some point you have to make things evolve but this upstream
solution simply isn't nice for its users.
That may be, but I don't think it's a distribution's
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Wyatt Epp wyatt@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:06 AM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
No sir, I was not telling a half-truth.
If the default configuration is stored in /lib/udev/rules.d for example,
and you can override that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding each
one to CC list of bug reports.
Why is there no herd or project?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTFN+VAAoJECIM0cW97tAgXtgQALWR5rFkNEU8ZEH/1Miw+7dx
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Many of the config files are large, and splitting them into segments makes
it easier to read.
Ah, no, impedance mismatch. Split configs are easy-- /etc/env.d/ took
something like two minutes to grasp years ago.
To clarify,
Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 20:01:25
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding each
one to CC list of bug reports.
Why is there no herd or project?
Not sure what gentoo-dev ml has to do with it...
...but I've filed bug 503354 [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2014 03:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 20:01:25 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
I'm tired of looking all the maintainers up manually and adding
each one to CC list of bug reports.
Why is there no herd or
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wyatt Epp wyatt@gmail.com wrote:
If the _only_ way to get the config for something is ever to run a
specific command specifically tailored for that purpose, then it's
evidence of a truly shocking and advanced sadism (not to mention a
complete and utter
On 03/03/14 23:13, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wyatt Epp wyatt@gmail.com wrote:
If the _only_ way to get the config for something is ever to run a
specific command specifically tailored for that purpose, then it's
evidence of a truly shocking and advanced sadism
