On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:23:11 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> And yet, in the same paragraph you mention -O3, which is
>> tantamount to just setting a flag and walking away. That turns
>> on 14 things you probably don't really need
Hello,
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:23:11 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> And yet, in the same paragraph you mention -O3, which is
> tantamount to just setting a flag and walking away. That turns
> on 14 things you probably don't really need.
Why 14 things? According to gcc-4.8.2 manual -O3 enables the
fo
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:55:42 +
hasufell wrote:
> Tom Wijsman:
> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 +
> > hasufell wrote:
> >
> >> Tom Wijsman:
> >>> Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every
> >>> week ...
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not sure if that is relieving.
> >
> > If only w
Hello,
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:34:05 +0700 C. Bergström wrote:
[...]
> Not to be a smart-ass, but will someone start a thread on global
> PGO (profile guided optimizations) next? imho it would be
> interesting and great to have some general training data already
> contributed next to the ebuilds. F
Tom Wijsman:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 +
> hasufell wrote:
>
>> Tom Wijsman:
>>> Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every
>>> week ...
>>>
>>
>> Not sure if that is relieving.
>
> If only we could cure an occasional cold.
>
Not sure how "every week" is occasional.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:35:20 +
hasufell wrote:
> Tom Wijsman:
> > Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every
> > week ...
> >
>
> Not sure if that is relieving.
If only we could cure an occasional cold.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-ma
Tom Wijsman:
> Eh well, nothing going on here, stuff like this happens every week ...
>
Not sure if that is relieving.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:30:45 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
> > On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
> > > What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages
> > > don't give an understandable reason.
> > >
> >
> > It w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/28/2014 9:41 AM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 28.04.2014 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000 Michael Palimaka
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commi
28.04.2014 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh пишет:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't
>>> give an understandable reason.
>>>
>>
>> It was added to the tree by someo
On 04/28/2014 11:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't
>>> give an understandable reason.
>>>
>>
>> It was added to the tree by
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:08:28 +1000
Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
> > What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't
> > give an understandable reason.
> >
>
> It was added to the tree by someone outside the Qt team without
> permission. Si
>should not cause any issues (provided compilation goes through).
There are few packages which compile fine but break something (I remember
some x11-library from bugzilla that broke xorg-server), but generally I
agree with you.
One annoying package is 64bit firefox, which can easily eat up to 15GB
C. Bergström wrote:
> Can you name a single package that you use which receives a measurable
> benefit from LTO? (Just asking)
Like for every optimization flag, it is easy to construct particular
examples: It can help a lot if e.g. a user's string-helper library
is inlined. Concerning memory, it
On 04/28/2014 04:56 PM, hasufell wrote:
> What is going on here? Doesn't look right. The commit messages don't
> give an understandable reason.
>
It was added to the tree by someone outside the Qt team without
permission. Since it's not ready for the tree yet, it was immediately
removed again.
15 matches
Mail list logo
