On Sat, May 10, 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014, hasufell wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux. Instead (like valve), people start to develop for
certain distros only (like Ubuntu), because it's just too much work to
El mar, 13-05-2014 a las 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
On 13/05/14 03:19 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 11-05-2014 a las 20:56 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: [...]
4. whenever possible, depend on the specific subslot that is
known to provide SONAME equal to the required by your
08.05.2014 08:07, Alex Alexander пишет:
x11-misc/whaw
Took this one, really neat and simple tool!
--
Best regards, Sergey Popov
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
Gentoo Qt project lead
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
It's called keeping status quo.
Hi,
Ryan Hill wrote:
Probably best to make FEATURES=distcc disable network-sandbox
then. People enabling it are explicitly saying they want to access
the network.
Do you really think it is a good behavior to automatically disable
something you can call a security feature? At least there
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote:
Hi,
Ryan Hill wrote:
Probably best to make FEATURES=distcc disable network-sandbox
then. People enabling it are explicitly saying they want to access
the network.
Do you really think it is a good behavior to
On Thu, 15 May 2014 13:12:30 +0200
Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote:
Ryan Hill wrote:
Probably best to make FEATURES=distcc disable network-sandbox
then. People enabling it are explicitly saying they want to access
the network.
Do you really think it is a good behavior to automatically
On Thu, 15 May 2014 16:48:24 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sandboxing isn't about security. It's about catching mistakes.
Ciaran has a point here. Thomas, you assumed that network-sandbox is
the only thing stopping an ebuild from accessing local services or the
Ciaran McCreesh:
Sandboxing isn't about security.
Sure it is.
On Thu, 15 May 2014 17:15:32 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh:
Sandboxing isn't about security.
Sure it is.
Then where do the bug reports for all the security violations
possible with sandbox go?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sandboxing isn't about security. It's about catching mistakes.
From Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_%28computer_security%29):
In computer security, a sandbox is a security mechanism for
separating running programs. It is often used to execute
On Thu, 15 May 2014 20:35:41 +0200
Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sandboxing isn't about security. It's about catching mistakes.
From Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_%28computer_security%29):
In computer security, a sandbox is a security mechanism
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 17:15:32 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh:
Sandboxing isn't about security.
Sure it is.
Then where do the bug reports for all the security violations
On Thu, 15 May 2014 14:44:58 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 17:15:32 +
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh:
Sandboxing isn't about security.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 14:44:58 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 17:15:32 +
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 14:44:58 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 15 May 2014 07:21:58 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm a lazy bum and I'm tired of rebasing patches that fail due to
whitespace. Is this doable or would it make the universe explode?
Please don't. There are languages where
17 matches
Mail list logo
