On 05/30/14 10:05, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Nothing at all, but I don't see a generic global SSL USE_EXPAND adding
any particular benefit, either. What are the intended benefits to
this, besides aesthetics??
Take a look at bug #510974. Because USE=ssl means different things on
different
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have some)
pending for 3 months already
thanks,
samuli
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have some)
pending for 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking
stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting the tree, and
also
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking
stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting the
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking
stabilizing the
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:59 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 5/31/14, 8:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:50:20 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is one of my points: I don't remember a single chromium bug filed
in Gentoo that would be caught by a test or that a failing test
actually detected.
Your point
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 15:41:35 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5/31/14, 8:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 19:50:20 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is one of my points: I don't remember a single chromium bug
filed in Gentoo
01.06.2014 15:18, Samuli Suominen пишет:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have some)
pending for 3 months already
On 01/06/14 18:48, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
01.06.2014 15:18, Samuli Suominen пишет:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have
On 06/01/14 08:07, Pacho Ramos wrote:
The problem arrives when even core components like udev takes so long to
be handled :/ (and situation would be much worse if Agostino doesn't
have time to make his mass stabilizations... well, each time I report a
stabilization bug that affects me I cross my
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-06-01 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-lang/fpc-ide2014-05-26 06:14:10
radhermit
app-emulation/qemu-user 2014-05-30 04:38:08
13 matches
Mail list logo
