Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC

2014-08-12 Thread Sergey Popov
11.08.2014 04:25, Robin H. Johnson пишет: The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-vcs/gitosis 2014-08-04 04:35:46 robbat2 dev-vcs/gitosis-gentoo2014-08-04 04:35:46

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Alex Xu
On 12/08/14 01:29 AM, Duncan wrote: Follow the instructions, as found in the headers of every mail on the list including the one you replied to, or the ones on the site you presumably signed up from? Seriously: s/presumably //, this list is closed-loop. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC

2014-08-12 Thread Jason Zaman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:55:51AM +0400, Sergey Popov wrote: 11.08.2014 04:25, Robin H. Johnson пишет: The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-vcs/gitosis 2014-08-04

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread hasufell
William Hubbs: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 *snip* These links might be helpful: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=06637c4215d55c57517739214c6e0fd6f8f53914

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:47 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: First, a sentence does not need to have a predicate. I know that for 99% sure in german and the english wikipedia article seems to suggest the same. Correct me if I am wrong. In English your typical English class would

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 08:47 AM, hasufell wrote: William Hubbs: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 *snip* These links might be helpful:

[gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like this? In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being a bad

Re: [gentoo-dev] A constructive reommendation on stablity improvemt

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/08/14 05:03 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote: Hi, On 09/08/14 18:18, Igor wrote: Hi all, Hereby the summary of my personal suggestions to increase GENTOO stability and help it's maintainers and developers. 1. make.conf Add

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread hasufell
Rich Freeman: so striving for grammatical perfection is a bit optimistic. In that case, we should just rm the repoman warning and stop discussing this matter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:26:07AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: *snip* Yeah, at best this seems a bit trivial. Do we have a policy that descriptions aren't allowed to be complete sentences? Many of our developers are not native English speakers in the first place, so striving for

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning? IIRC at least one of the QA team members is so

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 12:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread hasufell
Ian Stakenvicius: So instead of, for instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could instead be relegated to a nag that could be hidden with --nonag. It will still be broken, even if you hide it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 01:08 PM, hasufell wrote: Ian Stakenvicius: So instead of, for instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could instead be relegated to a nag that could be hidden with --nonag. It will still be broken, even if

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement. The implementation of it, on the other hand, yes that could be broken and in this case

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:25:44PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement. The implementation of

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-08-11, o godz. 22:34:06 Bertrand Jacquin be...@meleeweb.net napisał(a): Hi, On 2014-08-10 14:22, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: The script does not handle case of multiline description: DESCRIPTION=You have to clean that yourself. You could handle this by reading

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Chris Reffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 8/12/2014 9:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: [snip] I don't have a problem with QA recommending new tree policies, but if they're going to do this the QA team ought to first ensure that the team agrees (however they want to govern that), and then

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-08-11, o godz. 20:48:20 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: Hello World! TL;DR: This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION='

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org napisał(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level (something that can be quieted with a flag) for

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )

2014-08-12 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/08/14 03:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level (something

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread hasufell
Chris Reffett: if people want to run this by Council I'll laugh my ass off if this thing makes it on the council agenda xD

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

2014-08-12 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:38:43 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: That's what I've been trying to point out, people are seriously suggesting disabling dynamic deps for race conditions It's like fixing one audio driver in the kernel by deleting whole ALSA block It is more like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

2014-08-12 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 05:30:26 +1000 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/27/2014 05:21 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 03:12:07 +1000 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/26/2014 07:59 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:14:41 +1000

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-12 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Friends, the repoman patch is reverted. And that is the end of this. I do not have gx86 access, so if someone wants me to revert 3K commits there, I'll need a proxy... - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps

2014-08-12 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:25:23 + (UTC) Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote: Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: What a great way to kill the distro. I can already heat my house with the number of unnecessary rebuilds Do you upgrade

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 4/4] emerge: Let --autounmask=n override other options

2014-08-12 Thread Alexander Berntsen
From: Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org --- pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py b/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py index bfa63fa..37b3a54 100644 ---

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Autounmask changes

2014-08-12 Thread Alexander Berntsen
Here are the infamous autounmask changes agreed to on the last meeting: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/4351 They behave like this: sudo ./emerge =gcc-4.8.3 Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild NS ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.8.3 [4.7.3-r1] USE=cxx fortran gcj

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/4] emerge: Make --autounmask=y if --ask=y

2014-08-12 Thread Alexander Berntsen
From: Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net Signed-off-by: Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org --- man/emerge.1| 9 + pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/emerge.1 b/man/emerge.1 index be52f25..c52cd0a

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] --sync: properly decode getaddrinfo() errors.

2014-08-12 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes UnicodeDecodeError in Python 2 with getaddrinfo() error messages that contain non-ASCII characters, e.g. in pl_PL.UTF-8 locale. --- pym/_emerge/actions.py | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pym/_emerge/actions.py b/pym/_emerge/actions.py index