Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/23/14 21:39, Duncan wrote: Anthony G. Basile posted on Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:36:44 -0500 as excerpted: I've watched musl and uclibc and just hit up against the glibc changes as they mysteriously rain down from Drepper. Just a quick reply to this side point... There's no indication in

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 12/23/14 21:40, Matt Turner wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/nagios-imagepack

2014-12-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
# Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org (24 Dec 2014) # Masked for removal in 30 days (bug #531954). All current versions of # nagios block it, and it has unresolved LICENSE issues (bug #320241). net-analyzer/nagios-imagepack

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-24 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014, 14:36:44 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: Do we really need glibc 2.9_p20081201-r3, 2.10.1-r1, 2.11.3, 2.12.1-r3, 2.12.2, 2.13-r2, 2.14, 2.14.1-r2, 2.14.1-r3, 2.15-r1, 2.15-r2, 2.15-r3, 2.16.0, 2.17, 2.18-r1, 2.19, 2.19-r1, and 2.20? I can't fully speak to this

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-24 Thread Ben de Groot
On 23 December 2014 at 00:11, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: +1 for an archive overlay I set up the graveyard overlay for such purposes, a couple of years ago. But it hasn't taken off: https://github.com/gentoo/graveyard Feel free to resurrect it. (pun intended) -- Cheers,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/23/2014 09:16 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current approach is to store the data in an xpak segment that is appended to the end of the tbz2 file.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current approach is to store the data in an xpak segment that is appended to the end of the tbz2 file.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/24/2014 04:01 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current approach is to store the data in an xpak segment

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/12/2014 17:07, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 12/24/2014 04:01 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use flag combinations and the rest? The current

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] New file layout for PKGDIR and binhosts

2014-12-24 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/24/2014 10:36 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 24/12/2014 17:07, Zac Medico ha scritto: On 12/24/2014 04:01 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: Il 24/12/2014 09:13, Zac Medico ha scritto: I like this (and it has been a long time coming). What format are we going to store the metadata of the use