On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:38:48 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:26:03 -0400 as excerpted:
If you stuck -* in your make.conf then this change would have no
affect at all, since you've explicitly set the configuration of
every use flag.
On 04/03/2015 01:49 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
What is the current status/thoughts regarding libressl? Reviewing the
bug and some past threads, it sounds like the initial plan was to make
openssl a virtual and let either classic openssl or libressl fulfull it?
Not anymore. We will go for
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 22:26:03 -0400 as excerpted:
If you stuck -* in your make.conf then this change would have no
affect at all, since you've explicitly set the configuration of every
use flag.
That (and package.use still sticking) eases my mind considerably.
The current
On 04/03/2015 01:49 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
The specific reason for my current inquiry is that the latest openntpd
release includes the new support from openbsd for constraints, where
basically you can verify ntp time sources by checking their time
relative to a trusted TLS server (which
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:52:39 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Brian Dolbec posted on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:59:06 -0700 as excerpted:
This is a reminder to you all... since enalyze is little known to
users.
Thanks for the hint. I'd never heard of enalyze before but it sounds
