On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:11:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
I honestly don't see the point of this when `git log` or even `git
diff` or standard `diff` will tell you if what's in your overlay
differs from the source. With some bash magic it could even be
automated. The point of that
On 08/14/2015 01:10 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:11:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
I honestly don't see the point of this when `git log` or even `git
diff` or standard `diff` will tell you if what's in your overlay
differs from the source. With some bash magic it
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Don't ask me. I was against keeping the official listings in MediaWiki,
I already complained that we can't list developers who are refusing to
create a Wiki account and that we lack any proper API to access those
listings.
On 14 August 2015 at 17:45, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Don't force the implicit expansion on all developers and users forking
the repo.
You wouldn't, I thought we were talking about $Id$ only being expanded
on the git-rsync transition, and people worrying that $Id$ would be
expanded
Dnia 2015-08-13, o godz. 21:17:22
Patrick McLean chutz...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:43:24 -0700
Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
No, there clearly should be some things that are commonly present
that should never be committed. Those common things should be in a
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
2. How to control endian difference via profiles ? i.e. *How to get
ppc64le as a full stage/profile along side ppc64* ?
Could you give me in detail ?
you probably want to
Dnia 2015-08-13, o godz. 23:56:23
Dean Stephens desult...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/13/15 02:15, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 22:43:24 Dean Stephens
desult...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 08/11/15 10:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Now that we're
On 14 August 2015 at 14:02, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-13, o godz. 21:17:22
Patrick McLean chutz...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
We should have common editor artifacts and backup files in there, I
generally use this in just about every repository I touch:
*~
.*.sw[po]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/13/2015 12:43 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:36:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
I understood the usefulness of this line to some when we were
using CVS since it expanded into the ebuild revision, date, etc.
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/13/2015 06:29 PM, wireless wrote:
On 08/13/2015 05:28 PM, Duncan wrote:
wireless posted on Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:33:13 -0500 as excerpted:
On 08/12/2015 09:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 12 Aug 2015 18:27, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2) There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 13/08/15 20:36, Zac Medico wrote:
How's this future tense version?
I greatly prefer patches in the imperative mood. Add stuff. Do other
stuff. Fix more stuff. But that's arguably a style preference. Your
future tense version is unambiguous, and
They will be OpenPGP signed by a releng key during thickening and
portage will auto-verify it using gkeys once things are in place. As
such checksum for ebuilds and other files certainly needs to be part
of the manifest, otherwise it can open up for malicious alterations of
these files.
And
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand k...@gentoo.org wrote:
2. The question is why manifests are modified for rsync. In git
manifests are thin (only distfiles are there), in rsync they also
contain checksums for ebuilds and files dir content. Do we really
need this? These
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/14/2015 04:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand
k...@gentoo.org wrote:
2. The question is why manifests are modified for rsync. In
git manifests are thin (only distfiles are there), in rsync
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:19:10 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
I vote for a simple
Bug: 333531
+1
Of course, for external bugs (e.g. in other projects) full URI
should be used.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpwvJxv7YOQ_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08/14/2015 04:21 AM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/13/2015 06:29 PM, wireless wrote:
On 08/13/2015 05:28 PM, Duncan wrote:
wireless posted on Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:33:13 -0500 as excerpted:
On 08/12/2015 09:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015, at 15:04 CDT, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:19:10 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
I vote for a simple
Bug: 333531
+1
Of course, for external bugs (e.g. in other projects) full URI
should be used.
+1
signature.asc
Description: PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Gentoos Penguins,
if we want to attract more contributors we should consider to have one
supported EAPI (latest). EAPI 4 is the last not marked as deprecated
( EAPI 5). The move in ebuilds from EAPI 4 to EAPI 5 is very simple
replacing the
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 00:05:57 +0200 Johannes Huber wrote:
if we want to attract more contributors we should consider to have one
supported EAPI (latest). EAPI 4 is the last not marked as deprecated
( EAPI 5). The move in ebuilds from EAPI 4 to EAPI 5 is very simple
replacing the
On 08/10/2015 05:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Expanding on this: the rsync master creates the following
files/directories under metatdata. On my own system, I like to symlink
them to locations outside my repo so that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 08/15/15 um 00:19 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
Hi,
While I have no objections about EAPI 4 deprecation (except
concerns mentioned above), I see no strong need for this also. Just
declare EAPI 5 as recommended. Having legacy support for EAPI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/08/15 06:43 PM, Johannes Huber wrote:
Am 08/15/15 um 00:19 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
Hi,
While I have no objections about EAPI 4 deprecation (except
concerns mentioned above), I see no strong need for this also.
Just declare EAPI 5
On 08/14/15 07:15, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Don't ask me. I was against keeping the official listings in MediaWiki,
I already complained that we can't list developers who are refusing to
create a Wiki account and that we lack
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 00:05:57
Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Gentoos Penguins,
if we want to attract more contributors we should consider to have one
supported EAPI (latest). EAPI 4 is the last not marked as deprecated
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:16:47 +0200 hasufell wrote:
On 08/14/2015 01:10 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:11:09 -0700 Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote:
I honestly don't see the point of this when `git log` or even `git
diff` or standard `diff` will tell you if what's in your
Dnia 2015-08-14, o godz. 11:34:06
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (14 Aug 2015)
# net-libs/adns never had any Gentoo maintainer. Mostly dead upstream
# since 2006 (short activity in 2014). Does not respect nsswitch.conf or
# /etc/hosts. The current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/14/2015 01:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
..
2. The question is why manifests are modified for rsync. In git
manifests are thin (only distfiles are there), in rsync they also
contain checksums for ebuilds and files dir content. Do we
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (14 Aug 2015)
# net-libs/adns never had any Gentoo maintainer. Mostly dead upstream
# since 2006 (short activity in 2014). Does not respect nsswitch.conf or
# /etc/hosts. The current version does not support IPv6. net-dns/c-ares
# is a suggested replacement.
Daniel Campbell (zlg) posted on Fri, 14 Aug 2015 02:21:21 -0700 as
excerpted:
tldr .gitignore just applies to the Gentoo repository, not an entire
Gentoo system.
Thanks. That's exactly why I was confused when /opt and other out-of-repo
locations were mentioned, but I think you explained it
29 matches
Mail list logo
