On 14 August 2015 at 05:37, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Uh, the point of the 'pretend' bit in the name is that it *is* run when
you do emerge -p.
It is strange really.
It does them *after* prompting yes with --ask
Whats the point of that?
Granted they are very slow
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14/08/15 06:43 PM, Johannes Huber wrote:
Am 08/15/15 um 00:19 schrieb Andrew Savchenko:
Hi,
While I have no objections about EAPI 4 deprecation (except
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015, Paweł Hajdan, wrote:
Nothing seems to prevent doing the mass conversion first,
deprecating EAPI 4, and then having a second, slower pass to make
sure the ebuilds are using EAPI 5 as they should be. One way might
be to add a TODO comment during mass conversion, which then
On 15 August 2015 at 21:56, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
And even with current thin-manifest
workflow there may be conflict if they touch the same files.
They'll be single-line conflicts though, which will mean assuming
different developers touch different files, git will be able
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 09:06:48
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015, Paweł Hajdan, wrote:
Nothing seems to prevent doing the mass conversion first,
deprecating EAPI 4, and then having a second, slower pass to make
sure the ebuilds are using EAPI 5 as they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2015 01:04 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:19:10 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote:
I vote for a simple
Bug: 333531
+1
Of course, for external bugs (e.g. in other projects) full URI
should be used.
Best regards,
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:54:57 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand k...@gentoo.org
wrote:
They will be OpenPGP signed by a releng key during thickening and
portage will auto-verify it using gkeys once things are in place. As
such checksum
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:02:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
OK, if manifests are that important, why not generate full manifest
during repoman commit? If we do not tamper with $Id$, the only file
outside of this manifest will be ChangeLog generated during rsync
propagation. Then we have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2015 03:05 PM, Johannes Huber wrote:
Hello Gentoos Penguins,
if we want to attract more contributors we should consider to have
one supported EAPI (latest). EAPI 4 is the last not marked as
deprecated ( EAPI 5). The move in ebuilds
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org wrote:
I remember some discussions about ideas to make the tree more for core
packages and overlay for specialized stuff. How did we decided finally
what is better: having specialized stuff in overlays, or moving it to
the
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 10:50:02
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:54:57 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand k...@gentoo.org
wrote:
They will be OpenPGP signed by a releng key during thickening and
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 09:53:37 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 10:50:02
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:54:57 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand k...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 11:51:01
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 09:53:37 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 10:50:02
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:54:57 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 08/15/15 um 07:35 schrieb Michał Górny:
This is a cheap hack, not a conversion. Proper conversion to a new
EAPI is about using the new EAPI features. Not marking it 'done',
and pretending there's nothing more to do.
Yeah you are right.
Hi all,
I've started to work on moving of sci-physics/herwig++ into the tree
after discussion with Andrew (see below). It takes with it a bunch of
packages:
* sci-physics/rivet
* sci-physics/yoda
* sci-physics/thepeg
* sci-physics/looptools
I remember some discussions about ideas to make the
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 08:12:42 +0200 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 8/15/15 3:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Secondly, though, conversion to EAPI5 is not actually trivial, there
are a couple of things, 'usex' related for instance, that also need
to be taken care of. If it was just a matter of
On 8/15/15 3:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Secondly, though, conversion to EAPI5 is not actually trivial, there
are a couple of things, 'usex' related for instance, that also need
to be taken care of. If it was just a matter of running a sed -e
's/^EAPI=4/EAPI=5/' on all in-tree ebuilds this
On 8/15/15 7:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-15, o godz. 00:05:57
Johannes Huber j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
if we want to attract more contributors we should consider to have one
supported EAPI (latest). EAPI 4 is the last not marked as deprecated
( EAPI 5). The move in ebuilds from
On 08/15/2015 11:56 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:02:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
OK, if manifests are that important, why not generate full manifest
during repoman commit? If we do not tamper with $Id$, the only file
outside of this manifest will be ChangeLog generated
Hi and happy Git days! :)
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
It expands to the hash of the blob of that file; and from that, you can
identify which commits the blob exists in.
$ git ls-tree HEAD README
100644 blob 08ae16956b8944da2fef75fee892dcba457cf4f0README
$
$ (stat --printf='blob %s\0'
On 15 Aug 2015 20:45, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Hi and happy Git days! :)
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
It expands to the hash of the blob of that file; and from that, you can
identify which commits the blob exists in.
$ git ls-tree HEAD README
100644 blob
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
$ git ls-tree HEAD README
100644 blob 08ae16956b8944da2fef75fee892dcba457cf4f0README
$
$ (stat --printf='blob %s\0' README; cat README) | sha1sum
08ae16956b8944da2fef75fee892dcba457cf4f0 -
$
This is so simple to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/08/15 02:48 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 08:12:42 +0200 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 8/15/15 3:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Secondly, though, conversion to EAPI5 is not actually
trivial, there are a couple of things,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 7:24 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
No one has proven that git is cryptographically insecure. Everyone
claiming that probably refers to
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/10/when_will_we_se.html and
the fact that we don't sign blob objects.
While
This might already be covered in one of the other e-mail threads, but I've been
super-busy as of late and just recently ran 'emerge --sync' on my main dev box
for the first time after the git migration. I just synced my main dev box
again, ~10 hours after the last sync, but it looks like the
Joshua Kinard wrote:
This might already be covered in one of the other e-mail threads, but I've
been
super-busy as of late and just recently ran 'emerge --sync' on my main dev box
for the first time after the git migration. I just synced my main dev box
again, ~10 hours after the last sync,
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:29:21 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
This might already be covered in one of the other e-mail threads, but I've
been
super-busy as of late and just recently ran 'emerge --sync' on my main dev box
for the first time after the git migration. I just synced my main dev box
27 matches
Mail list logo
