[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ruby-fakegem.eclass: Support other than standard bindir

2015-12-21 Thread Hans de Graaff
From a1162d3453b7aaef0294a427785e38da687fd547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans de Graaff Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:08:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass: support non-default bindir By default gems can provide binaries to be bin-wrapped in /usr/bin in a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge getting slower

2015-12-21 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/21/2015 12:24 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Lately it feels like emerge has been getting unusual slow to calculate > dependencies. > I did a strace while emerge was running and noticed a lot of: > > stat64("/usr/portage/profiles/base/profile.bashrc", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, > st_size=183,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Ryan Hill wrote: > You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead? > Well, no, that's not gonna happen. Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to do anything but consume? If the stable version is broken and if needing to use ~ or live is not up to your

[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge getting slower

2015-12-21 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Lately it feels like emerge has been getting unusual slow to calculate dependencies. I did a strace while emerge was running and noticed a lot of: stat64("/usr/portage/profiles/base/profile.bashrc", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=183, ...}) = 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

2015-12-21 Thread William Hubbs
All, was this patch ever applied to gcc? If so, which versions? Thanks, William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo.git, or how committing is challenging

2015-12-21 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ryan Hill wrote: >> You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead? >> Well, no, that's not gonna happen. > > Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to > do anything but consume? >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-21 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/21/2015 07:04 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > The patch looks OK. > > On 20/12/15 23:32, Zac Medico wrote: >> Since the Manifest "stable mtime" behavior could be have >> undiscovered bugs, disable it by default, and add a corresponding >> egencache option. > You have an English børk here --

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-21 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The patch looks OK. On 20/12/15 23:32, Zac Medico wrote: > Since the Manifest "stable mtime" behavior could be have > undiscovered bugs, disable it by default, and add a corresponding > egencache option. You have an English børk here -- "could be

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] egencache: add --stable-mtime option

2015-12-21 Thread Zac Medico
Since the Manifest "stable mtime" behavior could have undiscovered bugs, disable it by default, and add a corresponding egencache option. Suggested-by: Michał Górny --- [PATCH v3] fixes the commit message and adds a comment block to Manifest.write in order to document subtle