Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

Hi guys, On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: >On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger >> wrote: >> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 20 Jan 2016 19:48, Duncan wrote: >> Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 as excerpted: >> > if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd >> >> Umm, you mean project,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd up for grabs: net-dialup

Hi Mike, On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:32:02 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: >On 17 Jan 2016 21:57, Lars Wendler wrote: >> I am going to take the following packages: >> >> net-dialup/mingetty >> net-dialup/ppp >> net-dialup/rp-pppoe >> >> I think that I might not be the perfect maintainer for these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4

Hi Dirkjan, make it part of the news item please. Kind regards Lars On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:16:19 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman >wrote: >> After what feels like ages, we're just about ready to stabilize >> apache-2.4. Since this

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 13/15] cmake-utils.eclass: ban helper functions in EAPI 6 and later

Dnia 20 stycznia 2016 11:43:11 CET, Michael Palimaka napisał(a): >https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6ff6dedb44fff4289764dc5eb960e1c6 > >Gentoo-bug: 514384 >--- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 12 > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > >diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On 2016.01.21 16:53, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:44 PM, NP-Hardass > wrote: > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > With all of the unclaimed herds and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On 01/21/2016 06:15 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:53:58 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> I would like to see a possible timelimit set on how long packages can >> stay in maintainer-needed; once a package goes there, if we can't find >> someone to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 15/15] cmake-utils.eclass: update copyright year

Dnia 20 stycznia 2016 11:43:13 CET, Michael Palimaka napisał(a): >--- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass >index 70b70e2..9e8e71e 100644 >---

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:53:58 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > I would like to see a possible timelimit set on how long packages can > stay in maintainer-needed; once a package goes there, if we can't find > someone to maintain it, we should consider booting it after that time >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:25:21 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/21/2016 06:15 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:53:58 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > >> I would like to see a possible timelimit set on how long packages >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/15] cmake-utils.eclass: replace replace comment_add_subdirectory with a namespaced version

Dnia 20 stycznia 2016 11:43:05 CET, Michael Palimaka napisał(a): >--- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass >index 1de863f..e8b24bd 100644

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:44 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > With all of the unclaimed herds and unclaimed packages within them, I > > started to wonder

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/21/2016 06:30 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:25:21 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand > wrote: > >> However it can cause complications when issues are detected, in >> particular security relevant ones.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:25:02 + Roy Bamford wrote: > On 2016.01.21 16:53, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:35:15AM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:44 PM, NP-Hardass > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Upgrading Apache from 2.2 to 2.4

On 01/21/2016 06:52 AM, Lars Wendler wrote: > Hi Dirkjan, > > make it part of the news item please. > > Kind regards > Lars > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:16:19 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman >> wrote: >>> After what feels like

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:45:20PM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:25:02 + > Roy Bamford wrote: > > > There is no point in removing unmaintained but perfectly functional > > software from the tree. It needs to be both unmaintained and broken. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:41 PM, wrote: > I think you misunderstood Roy. He was speaking about "unmaintained > but perfectly functional software". You're talking about "a package > that clearly doesn't build or otherwise simply doesn't work, could not > have worked for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/21/2016 02:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:45:20PM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote >> On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:25:02 + Roy Bamford >> wrote: >> >>> There is no point in removing

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

On 01/21/2016 05:41 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > Maybe we should start a "gentoo-ebuilds" mailing list to help regular > users learn the ins and outs of making ebuilds. Try gentoo-devhelp@lists.g.o, or the associated #gentoo-dev-help on IRC. We should be trying to get these things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herd likely up for grabs: kernel-misc

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:57:50 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > The current maintainers of kernel-misc herd so far haven't replied to > our queries. If we don't get any reply in a week, we will be disbanding > it and looking for new maintainers for its packages.