Re: [gentoo-dev] Hardware database

On 02/09/2016 07:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:53:09 +0300 > agentsmith wrote: > > >> Cool tool i create ebuild. >> >> On 02/09/2016 05:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > > Could > > On 02/09/2016 05:55 AM, Urbain YANG wrote: > Thank you very

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-02-28 23:59 UTC

kentfredric 7d04ef2 dev-perl/Time-Moment20160228-10:33 kentfredric bfbdecf dev-perl/Type-Tiny-XS 20160228-10:54 kentfredric d56e500 dev-python/jpype20160225-00:39 monsieurp 759459f dev-python/pyopengl_accelerate 20160222-11:06 xmw 139e680 dev-ros

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 83 bugs

Our bug queue has 83 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cmake-utils.eclass: _ninjaopts_from_makeopts, fix plain '-j' and '-l'

Fix the _ninjaopts_from_makeopts to handle no-parameter '-j' and '-l' options correctly and convert them to appropriate parametrized ninja options. --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: fixes to ninja MAKEOPTS conversion

Hello, Just a quick two patches against cmake-utils that fix MAKEOPTS->ninja conversion. In particular: 1. -k never takes value in make, so do not account for that, and always convert '-k' to '-k 0', 2. -j and -l have optional values in make, so figure out if we're being passed a correct

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cmake-utils.eclass: _ninjaopts_from_makeopts, fix handling of -k

Fix _ninjaopts_from_makeopts to handle -k correctly. Make does not support parameters to -k, while ninja requires one. Therefore, handle only a single '-k' and convert it into '-k 0' (no limit of failing tasks). --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Notice the --whole-file part there. Are there perhaps plans to remove this? Before the reversed ChangeLogs, this option was useful, but perhaps now removing it would really lower the traffic? One would have to make a bunch of tests over 1-2 months,