Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-04-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Brian Dolbec wrote: > Isn't this almost obsolete? it's now xmlschema... Why would that make the DTD obsolete? The DTD can be used as input format for conversion to other formats (like RNG or RNC). XML schema is pretty much useless in this respect, since there seem to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-04-28 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Brian Dolbec: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek > wrote: > >> --- metadata.dtd | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 >> deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-04-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > --- > metadata.dtd | 5 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd > index 7626a57..b608852 100644 > --- a/metadata.dtd > +++ b/metadata.dtd > @@ -3,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-04-28 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
--- metadata.dtd | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd index 7626a57..b608852 100644 --- a/metadata.dtd +++ b/metadata.dtd @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ - + @@ -13,9 +13,6 @@ explicit type) for Gentoo maintainers is prohibited.

[gentoo-dev][PATCH] dev-lang/go-1.6.2: enable go-bootstrap tarball for ppc64le #581278

2016-04-28 Thread Leno Hou
There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2 without gccgo Signed-off-by: Leno Hou --- dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev][PATCH V3] dev-lang/go-1.6.2: enable go-bootstrap tarball for ppc64le #581278

2016-04-28 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Leno Hou wrote: > There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch > support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2 > without gccgo > > Signed-off-by: Leno Hou > --- >

[gentoo-dev][PATCH V3] dev-lang/go-1.6.2: enable go-bootstrap tarball for ppc64le #581278

2016-04-28 Thread Leno Hou
There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2 without gccgo Signed-off-by: Leno Hou --- dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev][PATCH V2] dev-lang/go-1.6.2: enable go-bootstrap tarball for ppc64le #581278

2016-04-28 Thread Leno Hou
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 05:59:14 + > Leno Hou wrote: > > > There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch > > support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2 > >

Re: [gentoo-dev][PATCH V2] dev-lang/go-1.6.2: enable go-bootstrap tarball for ppc64le #581278

2016-04-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 05:59:14 + Leno Hou wrote: > There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch > support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2 > without gccgo. > > Signed-off-by: Leno Hou > CC: William Hubbs