On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:20:09PM +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> We still use grub-1 and I really like the automatic generation of new grub
> menu entries using genkernel --bootloader=grub, does this work with
> grub2 as well?
Yes, grub2 is supported by Genkernel.
You just have to touch or othe
Our bug queue has 85 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 15:21 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 12:45 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, M. J. Everitt
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 11/10/16 15:42, Tom H wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-10-18 at 12:45 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:54 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>>> On 11/10/16 15:42, Tom H wrote:
You can use exactly the same text in 40_grub that you'd use in
grub.cfg and have
My main concern in this thread, is that I don't want anything swept under
the rug in such a way that a wider issue is masked that actually needs
dealt with anyway.
Examples:
* A workaround to deal with a bug, especially one filed on b.g.o
- What happens if/when the bug gets fixed? Won't the wor
On 19/10/2016 07:14, Kevin Simmons wrote:
> In general, I could use a mentor I can ask questions of and get answers
> from. I have been a tinkerer/user only of Gentoo in the past and am now
> wanting to be more involved.
Sounds great! :)
Not sure if I'd call myself a mentor, but feel free to send
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> So if this commit was to get teleported to a different repo,
> --signoff by would be preserved, as an intermediate between these two.
>
> So I think the intent for this is "X reviewed these changes for Gentoo
> and takes responsibility for t
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:15:11 +0200
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> >
> > Personally I use it as 'I sign off on the Author's work'. I suppose the
> > commit itself is good enough for this but I personally prefer verbosity.
> > It also calls out that it wasn't my work.
> >
>
> This sounds mor
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:45:05 -0500
>> Matthew Thode wrote:
>
>>> Does pram allow you to pass options to git
>>> am (signedoffby for instance)?
>
>> It doesn't presently allow arbitrary argu
On 10/19/2016 07:15 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 02:13 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 04:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> Maybe I have missed something, but why would one use --signoff for
>>> a Gentoo commit?
>>
>> Personally I use it as 'I sign off on the Author's w
On 10/19/2016 02:13 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 04:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Maybe I have missed something, but why would one use --signoff for
>> a Gentoo commit?
>
> Personally I use it as 'I sign off on the Author's work'. I suppose the
> commit itself is good enough for thi
On 10/19/2016 04:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Maybe I have missed something, but why would one use --signoff for
> a Gentoo commit?
Personally I use it as 'I sign off on the Author's work'. I suppose the
commit itself is good enough for this but I personally prefer verbosity.
It also calls out
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:45:00 +0700
"Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote:
> By the way, as I was co-maintainerwith Pacho, and now my primary laptop is
> alo
> missing optimus (although, I still own few optimus-powered laptops, which I
> gave away to family members). So, not that I totally not inte
By the way, as I was co-maintainerwith Pacho, and now my primary laptop is alo
missing optimus (although, I still own few optimus-powered laptops, which I
gave away to family members). So, not that I totally not interested in
bumblebee anymore, but I can't fully maintain it.
So, can you (whoeve
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:45:05 -0500
> Matthew Thode wrote:
>> Does pram allow you to pass options to git
>> am (signedoffby for instance)?
> It doesn't presently allow arbitrary arguments, and it would
> probably be wise to avoid need for such arg
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:13:26 +0200
Patrice Clement wrote:
> In the case of Gentoo though, it makes no sense. We should strive for
> keeping a clean and linear history.
A DAG is what I would call linear history :)
Merge commits preserve that structure, git log performs a topological
sort on the
16 matches
Mail list logo
