Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] sync: always pass -q to git-update-index

2016-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/02/2016 05:17 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/02/2016 02:09 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The -q option allows git-update-index to succeed even if there are >> locally modified files present. >> >> X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/552814#c58 >> --- >> pym/portage/sync/modules/git/git.py

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] sync: always pass -q to git-update-index

2016-11-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/02/2016 02:09 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The -q option allows git-update-index to succeed even if there are > locally modified files present. > > X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/552814#c58 > --- > pym/portage/sync/modules/git/git.py | 5 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cmake-utils.eclass: export compilers to environment instead of setting in toolchain file, bug 542530

2016-11-02 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
From: Maciej Mrozowski --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 88d2163..23cc094 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cmake-utils.eclass: CMake argument passing rework - clean build_rules and toolchain_file files from unrelated stuff (pass to CMake directly) - move some invariant CMake option

2016-11-02 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
From: Maciej Mrozowski --- eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 54 ++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass index 393ee28..88d2163 100644 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] cmake-utils small rework + bug 542530

2016-11-02 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
From: Maciej Mrozowski Bummer, let me start it properly again, this time sending to reachable address. Maciej Mrozowski (2): cmake-utils.eclass: CMake argument passing rework - clean build_rules and toolchain_file files from unrelated stuff (pass to CMake

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/2] cmake-utils.eclass: export compilers to environment instead of setting in toolchain file, bug 542530

2016-11-02 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On środa, 2 listopada 2016 04:00:06 CET Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > --- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass > index 88d2163..f7eac26 100644 > --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] sync: always pass -q to git-update-index

2016-11-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
The -q option allows git-update-index to succeed even if there are locally modified files present. X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/552814#c58 --- pym/portage/sync/modules/git/git.py | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab and localmount update, round 4

2016-11-02 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 12:07:56PM +0300, Denis Lisov wrote: > > The recommended solution is to convert fstab from using > > "/dev/disk/by-*" to the LABEL=, UUID=, or PARTUUID= syntax. > > Is there any specific reason to mention these three but not PARTLABEL= > used for GPT (maybe not only GPT)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Problems and limitations of the current version dependency specs

2016-11-02 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 1:31:55 AM EDT Michał Górny wrote: > > 1. How often do you find '~' useful? Do you think there should be > additional operators that ignore revision part? IMHO, this one should be a requirement anytime a project/package is split between multiple ebuilds. This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-specific breakage when building dev-lisp/gcl

2016-11-02 Thread grozin
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, Zac Medico wrote: Does FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandox" help? Yes. I've filed the bug #598752 about this problem. Thanks, Andrey

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab and localmount update, round 4

2016-11-02 Thread Denis Lisov
> The recommended solution is to convert fstab from using > "/dev/disk/by-*" to the LABEL=, UUID=, or PARTUUID= syntax. Is there any specific reason to mention these three but not PARTLABEL= used for GPT (maybe not only GPT) partition labels? On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:13 AM, William Hubbs

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Problems and limitations of the current version dependency specs

2016-11-02 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:43:04 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:09:25 + > Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:16:18 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > However, while at it I should > > > point

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Problems and limitations of the current version dependency specs

2016-11-02 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 10/31/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. Answering inline to help context. > > I would like to work on a major version depedencny specification > improvements as part of the next EAPI. For this reason, I'd like to > first gather some research on how developers are using

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Problems and limitations of the current version dependency specs

2016-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:09:25 + Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:16:18 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > However, while at it I should > > point out that the spec doesn't really cover pure-DEPEND :=, so there > > is no guarantee that