Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: clarify "update has been skipped" message (bug 602854)

2016-12-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 16:01:04 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > When an update has been skipped, clearly display both the selected and > skipped packages. > > X-Gentoo-bug: 602854 > X-Gentoo-bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/602854 > --- > pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 9 - > 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Point user to additional kernel removal, instructions. See bug #581522.

2016-12-28 Thread Mike Pagano
Thank On 12/27/2016 09:12 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > looks like nice information to give :) > > ok, for me. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mike Pagano wrote: >> This addresses concerns that users might not realize that after an >> unmerge of kernel sources some files

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: clarify "update has been skipped" message (bug 602854)

2016-12-28 Thread Zac Medico
When an update has been skipped, clearly display both the selected and skipped packages. X-Gentoo-bug: 602854 X-Gentoo-bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/602854 --- pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 9 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pym/_emerge/depgraph.py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:21:51 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we > > > are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100 Michael Palimaka wrote: > > Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we > > are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't > > define the term [2]. > > Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally

[gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we >> are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't >> define the term [2]. > Any suggestions for improved text?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100 Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > > >> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and > >> the support of the wg-stable,

[gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > >> with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and >> the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some >> changes on our bugzilla have been done. > > Thank you for

Re: [gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and > the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some > changes on our bugzilla have been done. Thank you for the great work. > [...] > When you will choose