Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: python_wrapper_setup, fix exporting env

2017-03-07 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu 26.02.2017, nie o godzinie 22∶54 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > Fix python_wrapper_setup function to move setting environment variables > for PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH outside the 'if'. Otherwise, they are only > set on the initial invocation of python_wrapper_setup for the particu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1, add integrity checks for redefined control vars

2017-03-07 Thread Michał Górny
Merged, along with radhermit's patch. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-03-07 Thread Gokturk Yuksek
Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: app-emulation/fuse app-emulation/fuse-utils app-emulation/libspectrum -- gokturk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread Zac Medico
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:13:38PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> If all dev-go libraries wind up in RDEPEND solely to force rebuilds on >> upgrades, why not do the same with the standard library (dev-lang/go)? > > They should not end up in

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:13:38PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/07/2017 07:02 PM, Patrick McLean wrote: > > > > You also need to recompile to get security bugs fixed. With go it's not > > just compiler options, it's also the standard library updates that need > > a recompile to get. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/07/2017 07:02 PM, Patrick McLean wrote: > > You also need to recompile to get security bugs fixed. With go it's not > just compiler options, it's also the standard library updates that need > a recompile to get. > If that's the reasoning, then don't you have the same problem with every oth

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread Patrick McLean
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:51:12 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/07/2017 05:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was attending SCALE, but now I'm back to answer this. > > > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 04:46:22PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> What kind of dependency do we nee

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/07/2017 05:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi all, > > I was attending SCALE, but now I'm back to answer this. > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 04:46:22PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying that >> if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then th

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-07 Thread William Hubbs
Hi all, I was attending SCALE, but now I'm back to answer this. On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 04:46:22PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying that > if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then things will break, but if I delete > dev-lang/go, everythin

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Matthias Maier wrote: > >> The kernel doesn't give you a choice of multiple independent patch >> sets. We have just a few options that bundle many patches. You can't >> selectively turn them on and off. >> >> I'm not asking whether patching bitcoin is good or bad.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Matthias Maier
> The kernel doesn't give you a choice of multiple independent patch > sets. We have just a few options that bundle many patches. You can't > selectively turn them on and off. > > I'm not asking whether patching bitcoin is good or bad. > > I'm pointing out that if you want to do the same thing w

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Matthias Maier wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 10:52 CST, Rich Freeman wrote: > >>> As a Bitcoin user I personally don't feel too happy with my experience >>> changing without me changing USE-flags. I'm not against changing the name of >>> the USE-flag, just a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Matthias Maier
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 10:52 CST, Rich Freeman wrote: >> As a Bitcoin user I personally don't feel too happy with my experience >> changing without me changing USE-flags. I'm not against changing the name of >> the USE-flag, just against changing the default behavior and applying a >> bunch of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > > 2017-03-06 15:53 GMT+01:00 Anthony G. Basile : >> >> Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I >> think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin >> ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bit

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update bitcoin eclass to default to knots

2017-03-07 Thread Peter Stuge
Anthony G. Basile wrote: > I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch > against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. > I'll commit it after review. Please do not do that, Anthony. > Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find usef