Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 01:04:18PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote > > So with a general file name of arches.desc Is there any other data > that we want to include in that file? Possibly migrated from other > file(s). In that case a dictionary format yaml file might be best. > My example below has add

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-03-26 Thread Matthew Thode
On 03/26/2017 02:50 PM, aide...@gentoo.org wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are up for grabs: > > app-admin/hddtemp > app-backup/burp > app-crypt/md5deep > dev-python/appdirs > dev-python/husl > dev-python/pyro > dev-python/selectors34 > sys-apps/biosdevname > > These pack

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2017-03-26 23:59 UTC

2017-03-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
-ada/xmlada 20170326-20:02 tupone 14755823acb dev-perl/Cookie-Baker-XS 20170320-23:53 kentnl 3befcda4a9c dev-perl/Cpanel-JSON-XS 20170321-00:26 kentnl 2fe27cc36e4 dev-perl/Crypt-Curve25519

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, Brian Dolbec wrote: > I would much prefer for any new files to be created in a format that > most languages have data input modules for and are easily read/edited > by humans. While this can be read and split easily in python code. It > is not future proof for addition

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:04:18 -0700 Brian Dolbec wrote: > While this is a simple format. This is not a standard data input file > format for language tools to map it into native language variables and > types. > > I would much prefer for any new files to be created in a format that > most languag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:54:51 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Hey all, > > here's the updated proposal for a new "arches.desc" file, after > feedback. > > In short: > We introduce a new file "arches.desc" which essentially describes if > an arch (not a profile) is stable or not. The meaning

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, Fabian Groffen wrote: > When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-53[1] > right? Which doesn't agree with actual usage in the tree, though. Ulrich > [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:53 pgp07XMca9oQW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-03-26 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 3/26/17 3:50 PM, aide...@gentoo.org wrote: > app-crypt/md5deep I'll take this. I use it in hashing stage3's and tar'ed systems I push out. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2017-03-26 Thread aidecoe
Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/hddtemp app-backup/burp app-crypt/md5deep dev-python/appdirs dev-python/husl dev-python/pyro dev-python/selectors34 sys-apps/biosdevname These packages are quite easy to maintain, so if someone cares about any of these, don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 26-03-2017 20:54:51 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Congratulations for getting this far. What's your opinion? When you say "arch" you actually mean a keyword as per GLEP-53[1] right? Thanks, Fabian [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:53 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Hey all, here's the updated proposal for a new "arches.desc" file, after feedback. In short: We introduce a new file "arches.desc" which essentially describes if an arch (not a profile) is stable or not. The meaning of profiles.desc is not affected; profiles.desc still describes single profiles