Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:30 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:38:09 -0600 > R0b0t1 wrote: >> >> Hopefully this is not a tangent, but the OpenJDK release is available >> on Ubuntu. I have tried to understand the IcedTea build process

Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:38:09 -0600 R0b0t1 wrote: > > Hopefully this is not a tangent, but the OpenJDK release is available > on Ubuntu. I have tried to understand the IcedTea build process and > failed, as I was hoping that it could be packaged for Gentoo before > the official

Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

Hello friends! I am excited about Java 9. However, I am a very excitable person. Hopefully this is not a tangent, but the OpenJDK release is available on Ubuntu. I have tried to understand the IcedTea build process and failed, as I was hoping that it could be packaged for Gentoo before the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:42:59 -0600 Matthew Thode wrote: > > You seem to know a bit about this, has there been a bug made outlining > the troubles we will encounter as you know them? No, I feel I am already doing more than I should to help given my past treatment. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

On 17-11-16 15:17:15, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Just as a heads up, pass it along. For anyone interested. It will be > some time before Java 9 is available on Gentoo. It will take > considerable work to get it unmasked and safe for use. > > Once in tree masked, it will likely be very

[gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo

Just as a heads up, pass it along. For anyone interested. It will be some time before Java 9 is available on Gentoo. It will take considerable work to get it unmasked and safe for use. Once in tree masked, it will likely be very painful for anyone who does unmask. You have been forewarned!!! NOT

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-qt/qtwebkit:4 and remaining rdeps

# Andreas Sturmlechner (16 Nov 2017) # Qt4WebKit is ancient and full of security holes. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #620684 dev-qt/qtwebkit:4 # Andreas Sturmlechner (16 Nov 2017) # Depends on dead Qt4WebKit. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:17:52 -0700 Christoph Junghans wrote: > > > Ninja doesn't support Fortran as well. > Besides not supporting the full feature set. That does not seem to be effecting meson. Which only supports ninja. A considerable amount of projects are switching to

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-16 6:44 GMT-07:00 Christoph Junghans : > > > On Nov 16, 2017 6:29 AM, "Brian Evans" wrote: > > On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the >> cmake-utils.eclass from

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] out-of-source.eclass: A new eclass to help with out-of-source builds

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 14:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > // NB: I'm not sure if I haven't submitted it already but that was > // a long time ago, so let's try again. Requested by soap. > > The out-of-source.eclass is a simple multilib-minimal-style wrapper > to perform out of source builds of

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] out-of-source.eclass: A new eclass to help with out-of-source builds

// NB: I'm not sure if I haven't submitted it already but that was // a long time ago, so let's try again. Requested by soap. The out-of-source.eclass is a simple multilib-minimal-style wrapper to perform out of source builds of autotools (and other) packages. It is mostly derived from the

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

On Nov 16, 2017 6:29 AM, "Brian Evans" wrote: On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the > cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. > > - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} > + :

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake + ninja vs autotools

On 11/15/2017 10:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the > cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. > > - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} > + : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=ninja} > > For those with cmake ebuilds

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74 post-Council review update

Hi, everyone. Here's the updated version of GLEP 74 taking into consideration the points made during the Council pre-review. ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.rst HTML: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0074.html Changes: 09ed01f glep-0074: Explain combining multiple