Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: ideas for fixing OpenRC checkpath issue

2018-01-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/19/2018 08:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> Why not? Since /var/lib is root:root and mode 755, we can create >> /var/lib/foo while running --as=root (the default). Then afterwards, >> anything beneath /var/lib/foo would need to be created "--as" the owner >> of that directory. > > That woul

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: ideas for fixing OpenRC checkpath issue

2018-01-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 07:53:06PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/19/2018 07:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > It looks like we can't use your --as suggestion if we want to be > > able to create paths in /var/lib and /var/spool that are owned by > > non-privileged users because of the pe

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: ideas for fixing OpenRC checkpath issue

2018-01-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/19/2018 07:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > It looks like we can't use your --as suggestion if we want to be > able to create paths in /var/lib and /var/spool that are owned by > non-privileged users because of the permissions on those paths. It is > possible that service scripts are doing th

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: ideas for fixing OpenRC checkpath issue

2018-01-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:19:59PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Not at all. I'm working this out as I go, so better to speak up if > something looks fishy. > > There are a few risks that I see with the first approach... > > > Risk #1: From what I can tell, the current implementation of check

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: sci-physics/geant-python

2018-01-19 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (19 Jan 2018) # Outdated and broken for a long time, holding up several cleanups. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #513564 sci-physics/geant-python

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Remove built_with_use().

2018-01-19 Thread Ulrich Müller
The function was deprecated in 2010 and is no longer used in the tree. Use EAPI 2 use deps and has_version as replacement. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/261562 --- To be committed after removal of x-modular.eclass which is scheduled for 2018-02-01. eclass/eutils.eclass | 92 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Managing updates on many identical Gentoo systems

2018-01-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/19/2018 07:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 1/19/18 9:45 AM, Alec Warner wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: >> >>> On 18/01/18 23:36, Duncan wrote: Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:53 -0500 as excerpted: > I'm trying to design

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Managing updates on many identical Gentoo systems

2018-01-19 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 1/19/18 9:45 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > >> On 18/01/18 23:36, Duncan wrote: >>> Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:53 -0500 as excerpted: >>> I'm trying to design an update system for many identical Gentoo systems. >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Managing updates on many identical Gentoo systems

2018-01-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > On 18/01/18 23:36, Duncan wrote: > > Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:53 -0500 as excerpted: > > > >> I'm trying to design an update system for many identical Gentoo systems. > >> Using a binhost is obvious, but there are