Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:52:54 -0800 Matt Turner wrote: > EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050 > > It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new > EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.gentoo.org/648154 for > example. New ebuild added

[gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050 It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.gentoo.org/648154 for example. New ebuild added with EAPI 6 bumped from EAPI 2. Otherwise functionally identical. Now asking arch

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: media-gfx/photivo

# Andreas Sturmlechner (06 Mar 2018) # Maintainer not responding, depends on deprecated Qt4. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 598651, 635192, 644396 media-gfx/photivo

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-fs/smbtatools

# Andreas Sturmlechner (05 Mar 2018) # Dead upstream, depends on deprecated Qt4. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 644404 net-fs/smbtatools