On 03/22/2018 04:17 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:03:46 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
>> I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
>> name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distingu
On 03/22/2018 03:52 PM, Geaaru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a bit out of topic (sorry in advance) but connect to eventually new
> portage feature...
>
> for both portage and your fork I think that could be interesting add an
> extension to PMS for define inside profiles or targets masking of
> packages of a
Hi,
a bit out of topic (sorry in advance) but connect to eventually new portage
feature...
for both portage and your fork I think that could be interesting add an
extension to PMS for define inside profiles or targets masking of packages
of a particular repslository. Currently PMS doesn't permit
W dniu pią, 23.03.2018 o godzinie 00∶47 +0300, użytkownik Consus
napisał:
> On 20:03 Thu 22 Mar, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
> > I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
> > name
On 20:03 Thu 22 Mar, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
> I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
> name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distinguish it from mainline Portage),
> and aims to focu
On 03/22/2018 02:22 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> It originates from 2006 and should arguably have never been added.
> ---
> eclass/java-utils-2.eclass | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
These dependencies seem were only to pull in a version of portage
supporting
This comes via java-utils-2.eclass. It originates from 2006 and should
arguably have never been added.
---
eclass/java-ant-2.eclass | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/java-ant-2.eclass b/eclass/java-ant-2.eclass
index 8da5971844a0..1fd4feb39134 100644
It originates from 2006 and should arguably have never been added.
---
eclass/java-utils-2.eclass | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass b/eclass/java-utils-2.eclass
index 25e35c33dd21..967050925245 100644
--- a/eclass/java-util
On 03/22/2018 01:17 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:03:46 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
>> I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
>> name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to disting
W dniu czw, 22.03.2018 o godzinie 20∶17 +, użytkownik James Le
Cuirot napisał:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:03:46 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
> > I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
> > na
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:03:46 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
> I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
> name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distinguish it from mainline Portage),
> and aims to focus on c
Hello, everyone.
After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s)
I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical
name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distinguish it from mainline Portage),
and aims to focus on cleaning up code and adding useful features with
On 03/22/2018 12:38 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
>> On 22/03/18 07:31, Benda Xu wrote:
>>> We might be able to require GPG signed email to make a post.
>> Almost definitely.
>>
>> But before bikeshedding that, it would be advisable to find
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> On 22/03/18 07:31, Benda Xu wrote:
>> We might be able to require GPG signed email to make a post.
> Almost definitely.
>
> But before bikeshedding that, it would be advisable to find out whether
> it would be a good idea in the first pl
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:21 AM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> In addition, the following packages will drop their prometheus- prefix
> during the package move:
>
> * net-analyzer/prometheus-blackbox_exporter
> * net-analyzer/prometheus-node_exporter
> * net-analyzer/prometheus-redis_exporter
> * net-ana
On 22/03/18 07:31, Benda Xu wrote:
> We might be able to require GPG signed email to make a post.
Almost definitely.
But before bikeshedding that, it would be advisable to find out whether
it would be a good idea in the first place. Unless you want only
prospective developers to be able to contrib
Hi!
On 20-03-2018 06:21:00 +0100, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm planning to add a new category app-metrics, which is mainly (at
> least for my own use case) going to be used for prometheus[0] and its
> exporters providing endpoints for prometheus. It can be used for other
> packages
17 matches
Mail list logo
