Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Matthias Maier
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018, at 21:26 CDT, Kent Fredric wrote: > I personally try to use something of the form: > > "Bump version to 12.234.1567" > > Mostly, because it gives some vaguely useful context when reading a > commit summary log, that doesn't necessitate you running "git log -p" > or "git

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing support for mercurial repos in repositories.xml

2018-09-23 Thread Benda Xu
Michał Górny writes: > If you noticed that Gentoo repository mirrors did not update for 10 > hours a few days ago -- Mercurial was the reason. It is very fragile, > and if some server chokes during sync, it hangs the whole process until > somebody (which means me) kills it. And it's not the

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portdbapi: add async_xmatch method (bug 666940)

2018-09-23 Thread Zac Medico
Add an async_xmatch method, and use it to implement the synchronous xmatch method. Deprecate unused xmatch method parameters. Use the compat_coroutine decorator for backward compatibility with python2.7 (via PEP 342 enhanced generators). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/666940 Suggested-by: Daniel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 24/09/18 03:27, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-09-23 21:39:01, Alec Warner wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 6:53 PM M. J. Everitt wrote: >> >>> On 23/09/18 22:27, Kent Fredric wrote: On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 Matthew Thode wrote: > My hand slipped. What ever happened to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:45:27 -0500 Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-09-24 09:27:57, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 > > Matthew Thode wrote: > > > My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you > > > going to ping the list every time my hand slips

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-09-23 21:39:01, Alec Warner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 6:53 PM M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > On 23/09/18 22:27, Kent Fredric wrote: > > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 > > > Matthew Thode wrote: > > >> My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you > > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 6:53 PM M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 23/09/18 22:27, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 > > Matthew Thode wrote: > >> My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you > >> going to ping the list every time my hand slips up and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: support EAPI 7

2018-09-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 3:33 PM M. J. Everitt wrote: > > On 23/09/18 16:20, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > > --- > > eclass/udev.eclass | 14 +- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/eclass/udev.eclass b/eclass/udev.eclass >

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2018-09-23 23:59 UTC

2018-09-23 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2018-09-23 23:59 UTC. Removals: sys-apps/paludis20180919-11:27 zlogene 5d144f9e4df Additions: app-crypt/hashcat-utils 20180918-20:26 zerochaos f6225f11a1a app-misc/tmux2html

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 23/09/18 22:27, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 > Matthew Thode wrote: >> My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you >> going to ping the list every time my hand slips up and I mistype >> something? Not sure you'll have time for it :P >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing support for mercurial repos in repositories.xml

2018-09-23 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 4:42 PM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I'd like to ask Gentoo repository owners to switch off Mercurial > and remove all Mercurial repositories from repositories.xml. There are > two reasons for that: > > 1. Portage does not support syncing from Mercurial repos,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-09-24 09:27:57, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 > Matthew Thode wrote: > > My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you > > going to ping the list every time my hand slips up and I mistype > > something? Not sure you'll have time for it :P

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What means bup?

2018-09-23 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:36:23 -0500 Matthew Thode wrote: > My hand slipped. What ever happened to assuming the best :( Are you > going to ping the list every time my hand slips up and I mistype > something? Not sure you'll have time for it :P Personally, I would love it if more people tried

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing support for mercurial repos in repositories.xml

2018-09-23 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. I'd like to ask Gentoo repository owners to switch off Mercurial and remove all Mercurial repositories from repositories.xml. There are two reasons for that: 1. Portage does not support syncing from Mercurial repos, and needs to use external tools (e.g. layman) for that. 2.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: support EAPI 7

2018-09-23 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 23/09/18 16:20, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- > eclass/udev.eclass | 14 +- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/udev.eclass b/eclass/udev.eclass > index 4f23c9ebbdf8..baf60584938f 100644 > --- a/eclass/udev.eclass >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: support EAPI 7

2018-09-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/udev.eclass | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/udev.eclass b/eclass/udev.eclass index 4f23c9ebbdf8..baf60584938f 100644 --- a/eclass/udev.eclass +++ b/eclass/udev.eclass @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -# Copyright

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: add EAPI 7 support

2018-09-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 8:40 PM Marty E. Plummer wrote: > It seems this is all that is needed, and all the eclasses inherited by > it are supported for EAPI 7. I could be missing something, so please do > comment if I have. I pushed this, thanks!