Hello gentoo-dev.
I would like to ask to assign uid/gid 453 for the package
www-misc/vdradmin-am
Martin
(proxy-maintainer)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello gentoo-dev.
I would like to ask to assign uid/gid 452 for the package
media-video/vdr and its many plugins media-plugins/vdr-*
Martin
(proxy-maintainer)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:03:26 +0100
Michael Everitt wrote:
> Forgive my lack of git-fu, but which commit did this? Can we name & shame
> the author and committer publicly, and in front of QA, so that this kind of
> violation is highlighted to all, and noted for future reference?
I think you can
On 24/10/19 23:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Here we go again. All week I've been trying to update @world. I'm trying
> to troubleshoot a portage bug[0], deal with portage taking forever to
> fail, and now I've got to deal with the fact that someone was too clever
> to follow the PMS and replaced
Here we go again. All week I've been trying to update @world. I'm trying
to troubleshoot a portage bug[0], deal with portage taking forever to
fail, and now I've got to deal with the fact that someone was too clever
to follow the PMS and replaced virtual/pam with sys-libs/pam across the
entire
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:39:06 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> In the rationale section, one reason given for the choice of the hash
> algorithm (BLAKE2B) was to "avoid code duplication". Isn't that
> argument moot, if all hashes supported by Portage are implemented?
> (Or in other words, couldn't a
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Michał Górny wrote:
> +in 2⁴ = 16 directories), and each of this directories would have
s/this/these/ (This was there before, but can be corrected while at it.)
> +The implementations are only required to support cutoffs being multiples
s/The
OK, I will take 451 uid/gid for redmine.
чт, 24 окт. 2019 г. в 21:02, Michael Everitt :
> On 24/10/19 18:58, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> As per https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12807 I need UID/GID for
> web-application Redmine. Could I please get those for it? Any available
>
On 24/10/19 18:58, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As per https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12807 I need UID/GID for
> web-application Redmine. Could I please get those for it? Any available
> number will OK.
>
> --
> From Siberia with Love!
Check https://api.gentoo.org/uid-gid.txt ..
Hello.
As per https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12807 I need UID/GID for
web-application Redmine. Could I please get those for it? Any available
number will OK.
--
>From Siberia with Love!
On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 12:44 -0400, Gokturk Yuksek wrote:
> > I'm really glad this is resolved, and that the things started moving
> > again. I'd like to thank you for all your hard work on devmanual.
> >
>
> I'm glad we reached a compromise too. We may not always see eye to eye
> but I'll
Hi,
Michał Górny:
> On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 17:20 -0400, Gokturk Yuksek wrote:
>> I wish you communicated this particular frustration clearly before it
>> made you very angry.
>
> I'm sorry that I vented off here. I have explicitly requested in some
> of my pull requests that you can apply any
Hello,
TL;DR: I'd like to disable thick Manifest support in Portage, in order
to disable some of the compatibility quirks from MetaManifest format.
All files would still be verified by gemato.
We're using GLEP 74 MetaManifests for 2 years now. The specification
was originally written to
Fill in the reference implementation section. Reduce the requirements
for cutoffs to support only multiples of 4, as there is no point
in making the implementation more complex for something we aren't using
anyway. Fix a typo.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0075.rst | 38
14 matches
Mail list logo
