The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2019-12-22 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-emulation/wine-d3d920191222-20:16 sarnex eb6dcfe30a3
dev-libs/boost-numpy 20191222-12:41 soap a563140dedc
kde-apps/kcalcore
# David Seifert (2019-12-22)
# Unmaintained, dead upstreams, monstrous build systems.
# Bug #568364, Removal in 30 days.
sci-libs/jmol-acme
sci-libs/libcore
sci-libs/naga
sci-libs/spooles
sci-libs/vecmath-objectclub
On Sun, 2019-12-22 at 17:12 +0100, Joerg Bornkessel wrote:
> Hallo,
> In bug
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/699846
> is this ebuild for acct-user/vdr handling
> this is needed for an update on
> media-tv/gentoo-vdr-scripts
> without user.eclass
> this works fine with
> ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( vdr video audio
Hallo,
In bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/699846
is this ebuild for acct-user/vdr handling
this is needed for an update on
media-tv/gentoo-vdr-scripts
without user.eclass
this works fine with
ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( vdr video audio cdrom )
in this case.
I have another package this has to be converted
media
On Sun, 2019-12-22 at 16:39 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> HI there!
>
> Some time ago I invented patches.eclass, which facilitates my work
> with
> patches, and I would like you to express your opinion about it and
> whether it
> is worth committing in gentoo repo.
>
> Maybe it’s ev
HI there!
Some time ago I invented patches.eclass, which facilitates my work with
patches, and I would like you to express your opinion about it and whether it
is worth committing in gentoo repo.
Maybe it’s even worth it to become a helper, but not an eclass, or be bundled
somewhere in existin