On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:22 +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Some ruby-gnome2 ebuild does not build C bindings, so there is no need to
> call each_ruby_{configure,compile} and emake install of this eclass. Check
> if "extconf.rb" and "Makefile" to decide what to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
>
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:22 +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
> ---
> eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
> index
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 11:22 +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
> ---
> eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
> index 4f3f6011501b..ac112e006205
Update SRC_URI since the primary release site is moved to github.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index
Some ruby-gnome2 ebuild does not build C bindings, so there is no need to
call each_ruby_{configure,compile} and emake install of this eclass. Check
if "extconf.rb" and "Makefile" to decide what to do.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 14 ++
1 file
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index 7ffe57d1a9ff..7beb03e778c8 100644
--- a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
+++
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index 4f3f6011501b..ac112e006205 100644
--- a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
+++
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index ac112e006205..a1a84f3045ed 100644
--- a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
+++
Fold common test code from runy-gnome2 ebuild to this eclass.
To support test under virtx, introduce RUBY_GNOME2_NEED_VIRTX variable.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git
Since we can set RUBY_S only from RUBY_FAKEGEM_NAME, we no longer need
$subbinding.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index
All ruby-gnome2 packages in the tree is now licensed under LGPL-2.1+.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
index 67a5d58fba58..42325ce4f33c
All users of ruby-ng-gnome2 in the official tree are on EAPI=6, so we
can drop old EAPI support to reduce "if" branches and make the feature
updates simple.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 15 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff
The official tree no longer have ruby-gnome2 packages with 0.19.x. Drop
support for them.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota
---
eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass | 14 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass b/eclass/ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass
92a3d5612f0
dev-perl/App-FatPacker 20200503-14:12 kentnl
8241011ae89
dev-perl/Config-MVP-Slicer 20200503-12:44 kentnl
49f28dfc95b
dev-perl/Dist-Milla 20200503-13:15 kentnl
5eec6ce8512
dev
Hi Andreas,
> * Legacy boot and MBR will get kicked out. *
> This is your chance to protest or support.
Please keep.
I have several systems with legacy boot and know many people, who
prefer/need this too.
--
Best,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/3/20 2:31 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Recent pkg-config should have the correct path built in by default.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/720866
> Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
> ---
> bin/phase-functions.sh | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bin/phase-functions.sh
Recent pkg-config should have the correct path built in by default.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/720866
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
---
bin/phase-functions.sh | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/phase-functions.sh b/bin/phase-functions.sh
index 709fd7527..90e622e75 100644
On 5/2/2020 16:30, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> our installation handbook is right now something of a mess (in particular
> regarding partitioning, bootloader, gpt/uefi, ...)
>
> I'm hereby volunteering to clean things up. But - I'll go the brutal way:
>
> * Legacy boot and MBR
On 2020-05-02 22:30, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> * Legacy boot and MBR will get kicked out. *
>
> This is your chance to protest or support.
*holdingupprotestsign*
Why? There are still a lot of people out there who don't have (U)EFI or
don't use GPT.
Please keep this information or share why
# Piotr Karbowski (2020-05-03)
# Obsolete input drivers, use x11-drivers/xf86-input-libinput
# or x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev instead.
# Removal in 30 days.
x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard
x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse
For more information see
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-05-03)
# Last release in 2015, not compatible with >=media-gfx/gimp-2.10.0
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-plugins/gimp-lensfun
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, 3 May 2020 08:37:27 -0400
Brian Evans wrote:
> On 5/3/20 2:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 02-05-2020 23:24:42 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200
> >> Viktar Patotski wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'd also like to clean my system and have
On 5/3/20 2:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 02-05-2020 23:24:42 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200
>> Viktar Patotski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd also like to clean my system and have it Python 2.7 free. Are
>>> there any guidelines to check which packages are
On 02-05-2020 23:24:42 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200
> Viktar Patotski wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd also like to clean my system and have it Python 2.7 free. Are
> > there any guidelines to check which packages are still using pyton2_7
> > in my system?
> >
On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200
Viktar Patotski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd also like to clean my system and have it Python 2.7 free. Are
> there any guidelines to check which packages are still using pyton2_7
> in my system?
>
> Thanks,
> Viktar
>
There are both equery and enalyze commands
25 matches
Mail list logo
