Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:43 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 19/06/2008 в 21:03 +, Michael Sterrett (mr_bones_) пишет: mr_bones_08/06/19 21:03:29 Modified: package.mask Log: mask =games-kids/gcompris-8.4.5 until

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-21 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: # Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi dev-lang/squeak x11-libs/gtk-server Squeak and gtk-server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

2008-06-05 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:54 +0100, David Leverton wrote: On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. According

Re: [gentoo-dev] FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 11:19 -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote: Hello All, I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little bit later things like apt,

Re: [gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-15 Thread Albert Zeyer
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, Benedikt Morbach wrote: I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a local use flag. no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can get the same with: -gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would

[gentoo-dev] dedicated USE-flag is inconsequent and confusing

2008-05-14 Thread Albert Zeyer
Hi! Jan Kundrát said this topic belongs to the mailinglist. You can find the related bug-report here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221967 Content: From the name of the USE-flag, you could expect different things: 1. It stands for 'dedicated server', which would mean, that this