Robin H. Johnson wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from the second sentence, which
Juergen.Schinker wrote:
Bryan Østergaard schrieb:
It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm
finally retiring from
Gentoo.
Aj! kloeri! No!
i want you to stay, you are important for Gentoo
but what can I do
Bribe him!
Benno
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
I know I've seen many instances where the word INVALID has got
peoples hackles up, [...] This is the same issue I have with
NOTABUG - it's like saying, you're wrong, shouldn't have raised
the report, just perhaps not as in-your-face as INVALID.
Precisely. NOTABUG
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
I think that protection against harmfull new config files should
be selective to be useful. It should only affect directories
from which files are blindly sourced by some services you are
already running. There, and only there¹, new config files are
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 19:47 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Ideally the package manager would unconditionally respect the
config protection area, and it should be up to tools like
etc-update to (configurably) automerge new files and identical
files, just like
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* If no existing file with the intended target name exists, or if
the existing file has identical content to the file to be
installed, the file to be installed is installed as normal.
I would much prefer new files to be treated as if replacing an
existing zero
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
See the little D?
It's not big, it's not fat, but it's warning you. :)
Not actually an eye-catching.
To be fair, do *you* actually look through *all* the emerge
output if there's any D flag, without the risk of overlooking
Stuart Herbert wrote:
* Developers and Users Guides online [2], [3]
[3] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/usersguide.xml
Without the s:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/userguide.xml
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Klaus-J. Wolf wrote:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
* Manually keyword unmasking an ebuild, automatically means
unmasking the last one in the line of masked versions.
No. Use the = to unmask a specific version only. For example:
=sys-apps/findutils-4.2.25
Curtis Napier wrote:
I'm especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses
accessibilty programs such as screen readers or if you are color
blind or have any other accessibilty issues.
Not being blind or otherwise visually handicapped, but I use rather
large letters (18 pixels), do not
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Next draft will propose being able to append .read to a filename
to mark it read without deleting it.
But don't use .read, as it can be understood as both present tense
(imperative) and past tense. Better use something like .seen.
Benno
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
