Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Enterprise deployment tools

2005-06-22 Thread Jim Northrup
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi folks, I would like to get your opinion on Enterprise-oriented desktop deployment tools for Gentoo Linux (or the lack of). As a small company CIO, I deployed Gentoo on a small scale here but quickly ran into scaling problems and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] a #g-d first impression about voip (semi-technical)

2005-06-15 Thread Jim Northrup
what i really replied for is to ask, if i can forward your email to a friend of mine who happens to be involved with telephony with his company, i know zero about that, i do know he does use VoIP, so maybe he finds your hack nifty | | Jim hope you better luck next time in #gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo? Where went Fido?

2005-06-15 Thread Jim Northrup
Aron Griffis wrote: This is kinda bloggish, because it's basically a transcription of an IRC monologue. My apologies if it's hard to follow... This thread started out garnering cheers of elitest developer sentiment. There was even some mention of if they don't like it they can run something

Re: [gentoo-dev] a #g-d first impression might represent process and metastructure

2005-06-08 Thread Jim Northrup
Joshua Baergen wrote: 2) There are gentoo.org references to #gentoo-dev, but the process of interfacing, mentoring, and recruiting are self-referential beginning with a bootstrap of being on the good side of an existing developer. So for those of us who do not establish favorable dialogues by

Re: [gentoo-dev] i have an idea ! (erescue) ro-overlays

2005-05-24 Thread Jim Northrup
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 05:11 pm, Jim Northrup wrote: but a CF-based or initrd root available when /lib goes to hell is an absolute must for supporting fault tolerance. do you mean like the disk underneath /lib is blown to crap or a bad glibc is merged