Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Commitfests

2006-10-20 Thread Michael Crute
On 10/20/06, Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just a random thought that popped into my head: We could have a commit fest where everyone who wants to compete kicks in some small amount of money(say $5) maybe the foundation kicks in a little some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keep Sunrise... But not Here

2006-07-31 Thread Michael Crute
On 7/31/06, Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That has been discussed, it would not be a technical problem. One reason this should be avoided is control - as soon as sunrise runs on non-official hardware (like, say ... hmmm ... sunrise.gentooexperimental.org) gentoo has no control at all o

[gentoo-dev] Keep Sunrise... But not Here

2006-07-31 Thread Michael Crute
Sorry to start yet another thread on this but all the others seem to have just turned into a shouting match among developers... and sorry if this has already been covered. It seems that the most logical solution to the Sunrise "problem" is to separate it from Gentoo... I know that there are other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Crute
On 3/22/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A possible alternative that could be rolled out sooner would be some form > of "contrib" eclass. Make it a simple matter to inherit contrib and get > the standard contrib warnings and handling. One thing the eclass could > handle would be a USE=cont

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a vile maintainer

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Crute
On 12/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone (existing developers only please, I'm not recruiting) use vile? > If so, congratulations. You just volunteered to maintain it, starting > with bug #114178. You can join the Vim herd (which seems to own all the > vi clones for some biza