Re: [gentoo-dev] linguas.eclass

2006-07-24 Thread Peper
Complete rewrite is comming so wait with comments plz. -- Best Regards, Piotr JaroszyƄski -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] langs.eclass (deprecating linguas.eclass)

2006-07-24 Thread Peper
Completly rewritten to be function based and thus more universal: http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svndump/peper/eclass/langs.eclass Also updated firefox patch: http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svndump/peper/mozilla-firefox-2.0_beta1-langs.patch Comments are welcome again :] -- Best Regards, Piotr

[gentoo-dev] linguas.eclass

2006-07-23 Thread Peper
I have made an eclass to simplify handling linguas in packages. http://gentoo-sunrise.org/svndump/peper/eclass/linguas.eclass Mozilla packages can benefit from it right away(I can make the ebuilds conversion if the eclass will be approved), but i think there are more packages which can use

Re: [gentoo-dev] variable quoting, setting optional variables to , and depending on virtual/libc

2006-06-17 Thread Peper
include deps from eclass, which is incorrect b/c these deps are needed for build time only(like sed, autotools...). One needs to make sure that RDEPEND is correct if not set manually in ebuild with eclasses. -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: variable quoting, setting optional variables to , and depending on virtual/libc

2006-06-17 Thread Peper
Noted that based on the other replies after posting. Thanks, tho. I didn't know that until reading the thread. No, it was genstef who pointed me that out when making my first ebuild. -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] variable quoting, setting optional variables to , and depending on virtual/libc

2006-06-17 Thread Peper
manually in ebuild with eclasses. Incorrect. What's incorrect? Made some tests and that's how it seems to work for me. If i am wrong be more specific plz. -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Peper
would like to have a place to park pic, iconv, nls patches in testing, and embedded-kernels that are say vital for some devices but for one reason or another should not be in the official tree. Sunrise would be a good place i think ;] -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

2006-06-13 Thread Peper
(...) Is it just that now we have a lot of developers who are willing to allow users to break their boxes? Just tell me one thing, are you breaking your box everytime you use an overlay? -- Best Regards, Peper -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-09 Thread Peper
well. A couple of examples: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122500 And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try looking at something that actually supports your argument? I think it's an example of how user-friendly is bugzilla... -- Best Regards, Piotr