On 2007-01-30, Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope ... let's hope c++-0x comes out soon and that compiler vendors are
faster in implementing it than c++-98.
It's actually officially called (skipping all the admin stuff): C++09
That gives a good indication of when it is likely to
On 2006-04-04, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You say it should be obvious like it's fact. Not everything is obvious
to everyone--Not everyone is a Steve or Stephanie. They may interpret
conveyed information in different ways and the ambiguity does not help
at all.
It should be obvious
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp:
dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C
