[gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages

2010-03-12 Thread Robert Bradbury
it is possible to produce a static build and/or whether there is a clear path provided for the retention of legacy packages? Thank you, Robert Bradbury

[gentoo-dev] Why do packages which will not build remain in the distribution list?

2009-12-30 Thread Robert Bradbury
For the last week or so, there have been packages in the world distribution list which previously installed fine which currently do not, these include ruby-gdkpixbuf2, ruby-pango, ruby-gtk2, ruby-gnomecanvas2, ruby-gnome2 and ruby-libglade2 (this is on an x86 system). My reading of the bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc/baselayout2 stabilization update

2009-12-22 Thread Robert Bradbury
I am not sure whether init and/or who are part of openrc -- but it is worth noting that who -b which is supposed to produce the system boot time still appears to be broken. I believe I filed a bug report about this around the time of the late 2008 or early 2009 updates to openrc and I believe the

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant?

2009-11-09 Thread Robert Bradbury
I believe QA is important from the perspective that you want to assure that the ebuilds work. Nothing makes a casual user more annoyed that having an emerge for his machine fail to work. But if you are running the emerges unconstrained (e.g. you specify them in the keywords file) then you are

[gentoo-dev] emerge world taking excessive CPU/real time

2009-10-31 Thread Robert Bradbury
I commonly run: emerge --pretend --update --verbose --deep --newuse world at least once every day to provide a list of recently updated packages that I need to re-emerge. I've noticed recently (in the last 1-2 weeks) that it seems to be taking a very long time. The one I've got running now has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category

2009-10-12 Thread Robert Bradbury
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Victor Ostorga vosto...@gentoo.orgwrote: I don't know the history about init systems category, but obviously is necessary to stablish a category into which init systems should live happy forever (sys-init ? app-init? foobar?). I don't know what you want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category

2009-10-12 Thread Robert Bradbury
I agree with Wyatt's point. Wouldn't there be an easy way to reset the last access date on all of the files to say 1/1/2009 on a system then execute a relatively robust multi-user boot (and maybe a world emerge upgrade) and record which files are actually used during that process, then determine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Init systems portage category

2009-10-12 Thread Robert Bradbury
2009/10/12 Jesús Guerrero i92gu...@terra.es But there's one... That what the system set is about in first place. We could argue if creating a new category would be any good or not, that's a different issue. But there's already a list of packages that's considered critical for a Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] new global useflags: static-libs and dbi

2009-10-11 Thread Robert Bradbury
-libs state is highly desirable as well. I note, because I happen to have it handy, that Ubuntu, as installed is almost completely in a -static-libs state with the exception of glibc (i.e. only 20 .a files in /usr/lib). Robert Bradbury 1. It is worth noting in my experience there is some variation

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: www-plugins/gnash

2009-09-04 Thread Robert Bradbury
I've used the gnash plugin because earlier Flash releases were so problematic (crashing Flash would generally crash Firefox). But generally migrated away from Flash as it seemed to become more and more of an advertising distribution medium that one had no user control over (this is a subjective