Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version

On 17 May 2016 at 08:34, Luis Ressel wrote: > > Automated post-merge tests sound kinda dangerous to me. And I don't > think there's any stipulation about src_test() only running > upstream-provided test suites. IMHO, src_test() would be a good place > for most of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?

Michał Górny wrote: There is a number of virtuals in Gentoo which switching active implementation via eselect. However, most of the packages being 'alternative providers' don't seem to care about eselect at all. Is that the correct thing to do, or maybe should every package ensure that

Re: [gentoo-dev] intel (icc,mkl...) packages looking for new maintainer

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:19:33 -0700 Sébastien Fabbro bicat...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-lang/icc dev-lang/ifc they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay. Do these up-to-date ebuilds fix the Macrovision bug[1]? Do

[gentoo-dev] intel (icc,mkl...) packages looking for new maintainer

the following intel packages need new maintainers: dev-cpp/tbb dev-lang/icc dev-lang/ifc dev-lang/idb sci-libs/mkl sci-libs/ipp some of them are listed as me as maintainer, others as sci herd, but i was mostly the one maintaining them. they have up-to-date versions in the science overlay.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

Gaurav Saxena grvsaxena...@gmail.com wrote: I am interested in doing my final year computer scence project on gentoo. I would be having a duration of six months to work on the project. Could you please suggest me some good project ideas that would be helpful to me as well as gentoo. I am

[gentoo-dev] scilab in gentoo

folks, we are desperately looking for a sci-mathematics/scilab dedicated maintainer. none of us in the sci teams have the time for it. i did some work for a major bump in the science overlay, but it depends on many java packages, some of them in the java-experimental overlay. it has also some

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC]: Proxy-maintainer project

On Thursday 18 March, Markos Chandras wrote: 1) Should we use a new overlay? A new branch on sunrise? or work ebuilds in Gentoo bugzilla?I think the latter is the best 2) I think an email alias is not needed We can monitor maintainer-wanted/- needed alias if needed. What do you think? 3)

Re: [gentoo-dev] redistribute intel rpms

On Thursday 12 November, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Thus, we need to review the any specific restrictions which may appear in the Redistributables text files for problems as well. The Redistributables seem a bit different in Intel sense, see my post in [1]. I also put the redist file in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: redistribute intel rpms

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Duncan wrote: The big combo tarball could then be restrict=mirror or whatever, with or without a specific user click-thru (and restrict=interactive or whatever) as necessary and already used on some packages, following existing policies. Of course, there's certainly the

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3's default src_install needs bikeshedding

On Monday March 30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: It, along with the half dozen other variants floating around, are good starting points, but we need a final solution. Yet another one: how about building/installing the documentation into two separate functions doc_compile and doc_install? It's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

On Monday March 09 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: * src_test run unless RESTRICTed or explicitly disabled by the user (bug 184812) Yes, and I would go even further: keep src_test for unit tests and some kind of pkg_posttest for either a routine to test the package once installed or an elog test

Re: [gentoo-dev] ICC Profile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Apologies if you received this mail already, I'm having problems with my smtp. On Thursday July 17 Adam Stylinski wrote: The intel C Compiler (icc) has an ebuild for gentoo and the wiki has a script to integrate it with portage. This script works

Re: [gentoo-dev] ICC Profile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday July 17, Adam Stylinski wrote: Pro's: 1.) Bloody fast machine code. Intel obfuscates their architecture but they give back to the community as much as possible to make their hardware marketable toward the open source sysadmin,

Re: [gentoo-dev] why not player/stage/gazebo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Ok, show me the path to be a gentoo's developer. Maybe i can do it now. 0. Participate in improving the player [1], stage [2], and gazebo [3] ebuilds. [1]

[gentoo-dev] Removal of icc and ifc global use flags

Hi, I am planning to remove the icc and ifc global use flags [1]. The idea is to avoid specific compilers as use flags. Only two packages have the use flags, sci-libs/acml and dev-lang/idb. They are binary packages which specifically depend on either of the Intel compilers, and I will switch the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March

On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd like to discuss the possibility of including a new post in our developer base - the package maintainer. The idea is interesting. We have been thinking about something similar in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: some sci-mathematics packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Cloos wrote: Sébastien sci-mathematics/pariguide: unmaintained since 2002 Is there anything actually wrong with this one? I don't see any bugs open on it, and it works fine here. Dropping packages just because they are stable is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/12/07 10:24, Matthias Langer wrote: On 02:10 Thu 13 Dec , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote: 1.1 sys-cluster/openmpi/openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/12/07 14:12, Matthias Langer wrote: F77=ifort FC=ifort FFLAGS=-O3 -xO emerge -av openmpi This how it should be. To make it automatically reproducible, specify environment variables in the configuration files. Maybe someone can explain to me

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/openmpi: ChangeLog openmpi-1.1.1.ebuild openmpi-1.2.4.ebuild

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthias Langer wrote: On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:16 +, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: F77=ifort FC=ifort FFLAGS=-O3 -xO emerge -av openmpi This how it should be. To make it automatically reproducible, specify environment variables in the configuration

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/ifc: metadata.xml ChangeLog ifc-10.0.026.ebuild

On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 16:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 19:16 Mon 01 Oct , Sébastien Fabbro wrote: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: 1.1 dev-lang/ifc/ifc-10.0.026.ebuild INSTALL_DIR=/opt/intel/${PB}${ext}/${PV

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/ifc: metadata.xml ChangeLog ifc-10.0.026.ebuild

On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:53 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: 1.1 dev-lang/ifc/ifc-10.0.026.ebuild INSTALL_DIR=/opt/intel/${PB}${ext}/${PV} if use debugger [[ ! -x /opt/intel/idb${ext}/${PV}/bin/idb ]]; then INSTALL_IDB_DIR=/opt/intel/idb${ext}/${PV}

[gentoo-dev] intel packages support

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am in the process of testing updates of dev-lang/icc dev-lang/icc and sci-libs/mkl on the tree. Right now, I just put an update of these packages together with sci-libs/ipp in the gentooscience overlay. The Linux versions of a bunch of Intel

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Sebastien Fabbro (bicatali)

Thanks for the welcome! Gastronomy or astronomy? I'm confused ;) It's nice to switch. The sky has more than 3 stars ;) If you're a cosmology researcher, does that mean that you like astronomy photography? I admire it more than I can do. Sébastien On Friday 02 February 2007 10:49, Marcus