Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-16 Thread Thomas Tuttle
friendlier for IRC ops to ask you nicely to switch channels than to simply kick you out. --Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes

2007-07-16 Thread Thomas Tuttle
to delete the entire thread, IIRC. --Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-13 Thread Thomas Tuttle
, and it's easier to block. Just my $0.02, Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Smoother moderation scheme? (was: ML changes)

2007-07-13 Thread Thomas Tuttle
is sent to the Blacklisted state. The only people eligible to moderate are devs in the whitelisted state. Questions? Comments? Thanks, Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-13 Thread Thomas Tuttle
. Thanks, Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Thomas Tuttle
to contribute anything more. He's got a point. And, as an arch tester, I'm going to be annoyed if one day I need to ask something here and my post is delayed or lost because I'm not a dev. -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Thomas Tuttle
an uninterrupted place to discuss things, then you could fairly say that the devs need the moderation to work efficiently. Thanks again, Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Thomas Tuttle
list systems have a built-in provision for moderation. The devs who haven't been meta-moderated out (to use the Slashdot term) would have access to it, and could approve or reject messages from non-devs. I guess. -- Thomas Tuttle - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED