Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2021-08-16 18:31, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: Feel free to pick up task no. 3 from the bug. Everything else is either done already or easy enough. OK, I'll see what I can do. -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 16. August 2021 19:06:28 CEST Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote: > >> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and > >> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done > >> first. > > > > I see. Guess

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Montag, 16. August 2021 18:53:42 CEST Marek Szuba wrote: > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote: > > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and > > https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done > > first. > I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2021-08-16 18:06, Joonas Niilola wrote: What's the rush with 8 anyway? We still have eclasses that don't even support 7. And since 6 is now, sigh, deprecated, any bump to ebuilds depending on those eclasses will add to the evergrowing CI issue list right? I'd say it's more important to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 16.8.2021 19.53, Marek Szuba wrote: > On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote: > >> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and >> https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done >> first. > > I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the > foreseeable

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2021-08-16 17:49, Sam James wrote: See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done first. I see. Guess we'll have to stick with EAPI 7 for cmake revdeps in the foreseeable future, then. -- MS OpenPGP_signature Description:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Sam James
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/802786 and https://github.com/gentoo/kde/pull/903. There's some work to be done first. > On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:43, Marek Szuba wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba > --- > eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
A word of explanation seeing as I forgot to use --compose to annotate the patch itself. Looks like Project KDE has got their hands full with, well, KDE, therefore here's my take on bumping EAPI support in cmake.eclass. I am not a maintainer of this eclass so I've only made the smallest

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake.eclass: support EAPI 8

2021-08-16 Thread Marek Szuba
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba --- eclass/cmake.eclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass/cmake.eclass index 4bd09459ea6..52bf65a463d 100644 --- a/eclass/cmake.eclass +++ b/eclass/cmake.eclass @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ # Maciej Mrozowski #