On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:13:35AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Just wondering, we have get_libname, get_modname, shouldn't we just
> introduce get_linklibname or something instead of trying to overload
> get_libname?
>
> The implementation of get_linklibname could be to just call get_libname
>
Just wondering, we have get_libname, get_modname, shouldn't we just
introduce get_linklibname or something instead of trying to overload
get_libname?
The implementation of get_linklibname could be to just call get_libname
for anything but mingw of course.
Fabian
On 03-08-2018 00:09:41 -0500, Mar
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:25:28AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu pią, 03.08.2018 o godzinie 00∶09 -0500, użytkownik Marty E.
> Plummer napisał:
> > Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer
> > ---
> >
> > On mingw-w64 (and perhaps cygwin and mingw.org), there are two forms of
> > non-static librarie
W dniu pią, 03.08.2018 o godzinie 00∶09 -0500, użytkownik Marty E.
Plummer napisał:
> Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer
> ---
>
> On mingw-w64 (and perhaps cygwin and mingw.org), there are two forms of
> non-static libraries. Standard *.dll libraries are for runtime and are
> loaded from %PATH% on
Signed-off-by: Marty E. Plummer
---
On mingw-w64 (and perhaps cygwin and mingw.org), there are two forms of
non-static libraries. Standard *.dll libraries are for runtime and are
loaded from %PATH% on windows systems, and are typically stored in
either /bin or /usr/bin on mingw-w64 cross-toolchai
