Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK

2019-06-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:37 PM Benda Xu wrote: > > Mike Gilbert writes: > > > This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no > > ebuild removals here. > > Thank you Mike. > > > If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github > > PR, and let the CI bot

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK

2019-06-27 Thread Benda Xu
Mike Gilbert writes: > This looks a lot safer than yesterday's patch since there are no > ebuild removals here. Thank you Mike. > If/when you do want to remove old ebuilds, I suggest creating a github > PR, and let the CI bot check reverse dependencies. Yeah, that would have been a much

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK

2019-06-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:16 AM wrote: > > From: Benda Xu > > The following 2 patches are to introduce the runtime switching > mechanism to BLAS/LAPACK libraries in Gentoo. > > This feature is turned off by default and only the reference > BLAS/LAPACK is used to satisfy the dependencies. It can

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Introducing ldso switching to BLAS/LAPACK

2019-06-27 Thread heroxbd
From: Benda Xu The following 2 patches are to introduce the runtime switching mechanism to BLAS/LAPACK libraries in Gentoo. This feature is turned off by default and only the reference BLAS/LAPACK is used to satisfy the dependencies. It can be enabled by USE=eselect-ldso. Sorry for the