> Dilfridge had a proposal to ensure 3/6/12 month old systems could still
> upgrade, and I'm wondering if this could break those systems.
>
> There are 3 commits in the last year that finally removed the EAPI 5/6
> toolchain consumers:
> 486b77ab8d28c5bfd5a4bdfc5f9a5f432ffde563
>
At a technical level, it looks fine.
But I want to clarify interaction for old systems.
Dilfridge had a proposal to ensure 3/6/12 month old systems could still
upgrade, and I'm wondering if this could break those systems.
There are 3 commits in the last year that finally removed the EAPI 5/6
> On 29 Jan 2022, at 17:31, David Seifert wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: David Seifert
> --
series lgtm
Best,
sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
The series LGTM from visual review. Note that I haven't verified
the variable moves in wider context.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Signed-off-by: David Seifert
---
eclass/toolchain.eclass | 110 +++-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass
index 61718f0d9a0..741b6dfbbcc 100644
--- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
+++
