-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/06/14 05:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-06-15, o godz. 16:06:57 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
m...@mva.name napisał(a):
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking
build at all. And, in parallel, to add groupping.
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking build at all.
And, in parallel, to
add groupping.
How I imagine that:
etc/portage/patches/app-cat/name/
|
| - group_name/
| |
| |- 01_foo.patch
| |- 02_bar.patch
| |- ...
|
|-
Dnia 2014-06-15, o godz. 16:06:57
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.name napisał(a):
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking build at all.
And, in parallel, to
add groupping.
How I imagine that:
etc/portage/patches/app-cat/name/
|
| - group_name/
|
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov:
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking build at all.
And, in parallel, to
add groupping.
How I imagine that:
etc/portage/patches/app-cat/name/
|
| - group_name/
| |
| |- 01_foo.patch
| |- 02_bar.patch
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:06:57 +0700
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.name wrote:
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking build
at all. And, in parallel, to add groupping.
[...]
Any objections/approvals/suggestions?
What are the use cases of this idea? What is its
Am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2014, 11:06:57 schrieb Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov:
My idea is to allow failing for some patches without breaking build at all.
Please No. It just generates a big mess.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/