On 06/17/2012 05:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> But Python doesn't have one. Bindings built using other
> languages don't have that either.
That seems something interesting to tackle with the python community.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:42:55 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> Bleh; wish your attachment had been text/plain for inline
> commenting; pardon any mangling...
Sorry, forgot to change the type before sending.
> > 3. Defining dynamic SLOT groups
> > ---
> >
> > The list of
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
> Micha?? G??rny wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> > rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> > than forking the
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:49:37 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 17/06/12 11:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200 Thomas Sachau
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ... If I weren't using 32-bit libs, and now I want to compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/06/12 11:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200 Thomas Sachau
> wrote:
>>>
>>> ... If I weren't using 32-bit libs, and now I want to compile
>>> 32-bit wine, I have to recompile most of my libraries for both
>>> ABIs.
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> than forking the gist.
>
> [1]:https://gist.github.com/2943774
Updated version. I've introduc
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
Beside that, it seems to solve things pretty similar to the
proposed way in multilib-portage for cross-compiling (which could
also be adapted for multi-slot languages) with different wording
an
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> Beside that, it seems to solve things pretty similar to the
> >> proposed way in multilib-portage for cross-compiling (which could
> >> also be adapted for multi-slot languages) with different wording
> >> and with additional work for e
Michał Górny schrieb:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:09:14 +0200
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
>> Michał Górny schrieb:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This
>>> is my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages
>>> for multiple Python and R
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:51:50 +0200
Marien Zwart wrote:
> A common operation in an ebuild will be (say) "get the selected
> version of python". That's easy enough if there's only one kind of
> dynamic slot being used by the ebuild (just use CURRENT_SLOTS
> directly), but if the ebuild supports mor
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:43:30 +0200
Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view
> > it rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list,
> > rather than forking the gist.
>
>
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:09:14 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This
> > is my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages
> > for multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:26:55 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
> my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
> multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for
> multilib.
I'm pretty sure we ca
Michał Górny schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
> my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
> multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for multilib.
>
> The spec tries to explain the broad idea,
On zo, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> than forking the gist.
I've only thought about this a little, but some thoughts so far:
A common
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 09:26 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm attaching a reStructuredText version of the spec. You can view it
> rendered as a gist[1]. But please keep the replies on the list, rather
> than forking the gist.
I don't like the approach taken in 6. I'd rather state that there should
Hello,
I have prepared a first draft of 'dynamic SLOT' specification. This is
my proposal in attempt to solve the problem of building packages for
multiple Python and Ruby versions. It could also be reused for multilib.
The spec tries to explain the broad idea, and all problems relevant to
it. It
17 matches
Mail list logo
