Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] virtual/polkit-agent virtual pkg

2011-09-08 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: We have actually 3 polkit agent implementations in Portage: gnome-extra/polkit-gnome lxde-base/lxpolkit sys-auth/polkit-kde-agent There's one more: gnome-base/gnome-shell GNOME Shell has its own polkit-agent

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] virtual/polkit-agent virtual pkg

2011-09-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 09/06/2011 07:44 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote: If user is emerging some polkit-requiring package on DE-less system, it will pull big bunch of KDE, GNOME, etc. pacakges, which is not desired. Also, nm-applet and others can be set up with localauthority files, without help of polkit agents. I

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] virtual/polkit-agent virtual pkg

2011-09-06 Thread Fabio Erculiani
We have actually 3 polkit agent implementations in Portage: gnome-extra/polkit-gnome lxde-base/lxpolkit sys-auth/polkit-kde-agent I guess a virtual is required. Just a simple example, gnome-extra/nm-applet requires a polkit auth agent (not present in RDEPEND atm -- bug!) in order to handle wifi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] virtual/polkit-agent virtual pkg

2011-09-06 Thread Maxim Koltsov
If user is emerging some polkit-requiring package on DE-less system, it will pull big bunch of KDE, GNOME, etc. pacakges, which is not desired. Also, nm-applet and others can be set up with localauthority files, without help of polkit agents. I don't think virtual will solve this case.