On Thursday 27 November 2008, Duncan wrote:
> In that case, it may be better to do the limited code duplication,
> given the relative permanence of eclasses.
So, what is it we're short of? Developer time or harddrive space? Is our
problem that our packages start to bitrot or that we have huge nu
Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov
2008 20:38:39 +0100:
> This isn't a catch-all eclass. It's designed for a very narrow group of
> ebuilds which will only get smaller as I transition the packages to
> eapi-2 and use depends.
In that cas
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 09:42 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > > # Make selecting components configurable.
> > > > epatch ${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}-configurable.diff
> > >
> > > This s
On 15:39 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
> >
> > Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > > > certain item is in a li
On 09:42 Wed 26 Nov , Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > # Make selecting components configurable.
> > > epatch ${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}-configurable.diff
> >
> > This seems like something you might want optional, depending on some
> > variable.
>
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
>
> Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > > certain item is in a list.
> >
> > I disagree.
>
> You do? Why do you think it's bet
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:42:07 +0100
Peter Alfredsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This seems like a really strange strategy for checking whether a
> > certain item is in a list.
>
> I disagree.
You do? Why do you think it's better than 'has'?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wednesday 26 November 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 23:52 Tue 25 Nov , Peter Alfredsen (loki_val) wrote:
> > loki_val08/11/25 23:52:04
> >
> > Added:gtk-sharp-module.eclass
> > Log:
> > eclass required for gnome-sharp and gnome-desktop-sharp packages
>
> Did I m
On 23:52 Tue 25 Nov , Peter Alfredsen (loki_val) wrote:
> loki_val08/11/25 23:52:04
>
> Added:gtk-sharp-module.eclass
> Log:
> eclass required for gnome-sharp and gnome-desktop-sharp packages
Did I miss this on gentoo-dev? All eclasses must be sent there for
review
