Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Rémi Cardona
Vlastimil Babka a écrit : How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something. Bellow is my contribution to this thread :) Cheers, Rémi --- kernel-2.eclass 2007-12-17 17:06:02.0 +0100 +++ kernel-2.eclass

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Duncan
Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:55:12 +0100: How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something. Well, that doesn't help those who get their kernels

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:45 +, Duncan wrote: How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something. Well, that doesn't help those who get their kernels elsewhere, which IMO are the ones most likely to have their own

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I don't hear any complaints, I'd like to go ahead and get a GMN article together. Good to go in my eyes... Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Chris Gianelloni wrote: Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very small number of people whom are likely to be more advanced users. I think adding the info to GMN/gentoo-dev-announce/gentoo-user should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 14:21 +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very small number of people whom are likely to be more advanced users. I think

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:45:53 -0800: Well, we can hold off adding it to the actual tree until after the next GMN, so that's not really an issue. My main question was if there was any opposition, and it appears that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-02 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:50:21 +0100 Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vlastimil Babka a écrit : How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something. Bellow is my contribution to this thread :) Cheers, Rémi

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-01 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:05:18 -0500: On Friday 01 February 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: base/packages: removed debianutils I don't think we reached a decision on whether debianutils should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes to some profiles

2008-02-01 Thread Vlastimil Babka
Duncan wrote: A GWN or similar announcement before it moves beyond the dev profiles would be nice, but if the affected devs (incl. bugwranglers) are willing to deal with the complaints and they seem to be, the leaner system and image is IMO a good thing, and announcement or not, people really