Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
block #117482?
Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug reports,
(apologies in advance if this goes through twice)
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
block #117482?
Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
Ryan Hill wrote:
Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any
problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in
testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd
like
to reopen the original ~arch bugs and
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
it. What we really need is for more people to test
