[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:28 +0200 Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote: For FEATURES=test a policy for how to handle stuff like: if use test; then elog ewarn You have unit tests enabled, this results in an insecure library ewarn It

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-04 Thread Peter Hjalmarsson
lör 2009-10-03 klockan 14:21 -0600 skrev Ryan Hill: On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=1 to force ld behave asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles? Speak up if you think

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-03 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=1 to force ld behave asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles? Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea. Thanks, Samuli I think it's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: LD_AS_NEEDED=1 in profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?

2009-10-03 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ryan Hill wrote: On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=1 to force ld behave asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles? Speak up if you think it's a terrible idea. Thanks, Samuli