В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
topic?
A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a
minute.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:30:20 +0400
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
topic?
A
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
topic?
With packages as dbus that breaks with FEATURES/USE=test hand in hand
with packages like dev-libs/gmp[1] there would really be nice to know if
you are supposed to be screwed or helped by FEATURES/USE=test...
[1](from
Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 as excerpted:
I'd like to propose a new USE flag, qa-test or a better name, to handle
these cases in a consistent way. This would give us a way to
differentiate between tests that everyone should run and tests that only
devs and
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:13:31 Duncan wrote:
Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 as excerpted:
I'd like to propose a new USE flag, qa-test or a better name, to handle
these cases in a consistent way. This would give us a way to
differentiate between tests that
Patrick Lauer posted on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:36:47 +0200 as excerpted:
Now I see this proposal for making it a USE flag, which may or may not
be more appropriate, I don't know. I do know I'd love to see someone
explain the differences.
It's a bit more selective. RESTRICT is a global no, this
ons 2009-10-07 klockan 16:46 +0200 skrev Gilles Dartiguelongue:
Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 à 20:38 -0600, Ryan Hill a écrit :
Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful for
developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be foisted on
users. Dbus' case is
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:36:47 +0200
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:13:31 Duncan wrote:
The proposal then
was to turn FEATURES=test on by default for a specific EAPI,
... which is never more than a proposal by people not fixing the packages.
Just
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:46:36 +0200
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 à 20:38 -0600, Ryan Hill a écrit :
Some packages, like dbus[1], have testing features that, while useful for
developers and arch-testers, aren't something that should be foisted on