Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-08 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alec Warner wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Christian Faulhammer wrote: >>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-08 Thread Steve Long
Thomas Anderson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:43:12PM +0100, Steve Long wrote: >> Christian Faulhammer wrote: >> >> > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler >> >> for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] EAPI 2 Draft

2008-09-08 Thread Steve Long
Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Christian Faulhammer wrote: >> >>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the ou